the 6 "best" smw's....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by socrates, Jul 23, 2009.


  1. Vanihm

    Vanihm Active Member Full Member

    1,288
    0
    Mar 6, 2008
    They had to throw in Ward and Dirrell just so US viewers would care. Typical.
     
  2. £4£

    £4£ Active Member Full Member

    1,332
    0
    Jan 16, 2009
    I was plus'in the Bika Vs Froch suggestion, next time i'll underline it :good
     
  3. Big Harry

    Big Harry Member Full Member

    154
    0
    Jul 20, 2009
    Aint that the truth.

    If they actually had the top 6 only Taylor would be in it from the USA.
     
  4. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    good responses so far....
     
  5. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  6. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    That was quite a while ago though. At that point, all Bika really had on his resume was an old win over Sam Soliman and a technical draw against Markus Beyer. After the Calzaghe fight, he's become much more of a known quantity. He gave Calzaghe one of the tougher fights of his career, he walked through the Contender tournament, he walked through Peter Manfredo. Granted, he was badly beaten by Lucian Bute, but Bute's the #2 SMW in the world, so it's not a huge black mark.

    But Ward and Dirrell are two fighters that Showtime has made a significant investment in building up. The tournament doesn't happen without Showtime's money, so that's that. Despite weak resumes, they both have bigger names than Bika, at least stateside.
     
  7. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Im ok with Dirrel and Ward in the tourney and im happy to call the winner of the super six the real legit super middleweight champion.
     
  8. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007

    I know. What a crock of ****. An American television network has the gall to want American fighters in the tournament they helped finance and put together. What "cheek"!
     
  9. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I'd have preferred to see Bika in there. He's a good solid fighter who could easily cause an upset. I think he's quite entertaining to watch as well. I like a dirty ******* of a fighter.
     
  10. Arriba

    Arriba Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,148
    6
    Jun 30, 2007
    Dirrell is as close to a homegrown Showtime product as they have (his last 3 fights have been on said network) so I think he got in on that alone.
     
  11. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    you nominated in my thread yet?
     
  12. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Bute is clearly top 3, and Andrade is clearly of higher calibre than Dirrell, but complications exist and the tournament is already covering amazing ground in terms of bridging the differences of opinions of promoters. All will pan out as it should and i am sure at some point if Bute continues to have success he will meet the top dog/s of the tourny.
     
  13. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    I think that their are a number of fighters who are more deserving than Abraham, Ward, Dirrell, and Taylor, and that calling these guys "the best" is pure hyperbole. However, it's still an awesome tournament, and loaded with intrigue. This is do or die for Jermain Taylor, and I can't wait to see what happens. Ward and Dirrell now have the opportunity to shock the world. And, it will be great fun to watch Arthur Abraham figure out he should have continued to defend his middleweight title against hobos.
     
  14. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    im not knocking direll,i just think there are fighters more deserving
     
  15. Arriba

    Arriba Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,148
    6
    Jun 30, 2007
    The point really isn't the most deserving...after Kessler, Froch, Ward and Abraham...the thing really just needed two guys to fill in and complete the set (the tournament is built around those 4). Dirrell and Taylor have some U.S. Value and Showtime HAS invested a lot into Dirrell...so why not?

    It's clearly not the top 6 SMWs in the game but nothing is perfect.