The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Truth.............this will be ignored like the last one you posted.

 

No. Hatton was the best at 140 at the time. This was before Bradley, Alexander ect

Who else was at 140?? Urango? Malignaggi? Holt? Torres? Kotelnik? Any of these guys better then Hatton? Nope.

 

Bradley won a title in '08, no?
Pac vs. Hatton was in '09, no?

This was also a Hatton that was KTFO by FLoyd and showed wear and tear agaisnt Lazcano. So yes, I think Bradley would have tested him better to see where he was really at.

Hatton comes right at you with his chin. Bradley doesn't.

Skill wise, Bradley is the better challenge.

That said, I'm not favoring Bradley over Pac.

Better debate is at WW to JrMW now.

Hatton was lineal title holder so it was the clear choice to make for legacy and money.

 

Haha don't feed this lil ***** troll who's diverting the talk from his idol who's in vacation right now. :yep

 

If I were a ***** I would think he fought a Prime Shane Mosley, a Prime Oscar, fought the best at 147+ and would agree with him that he is the best of all Time. Neither of that is true.

Don't try to avoid the topic of the thread.

The thread was directed at Floyd too by the way. Point: both are doing it.

 

Apparently not, since you guys still think Pac is to blame for the fight not happening ....who's on vacation and who's fighting?

 

No you are a *****...you are judging Pac's resume in hindsight. At the time of the fight, Pac was either an underdog or the fight could have went either way. Just because Pac dominates the **** out of them, does not mean he cherry picks his opponents. Cherry picking means you know BEFORE the fight that he would dominate the opponent, not in hindsight atsch

 

No, it only seems like that because I am new to the forum.

Pac tends to be underrated going into a fight for two reasons: One, he has lost before, even against lesser competition. Two, few people actually pay attention to what is going on with the opponent he is fighting. They only see the "name" instead of where the fighter is at in his career.
Think "Tyson" with how hyped up he still was post-prison. Not many realized this guy was not only not the fighter he was from Berbick to Spinks, but he was barely the fighter he was for Ruddock. But he was still seen as "Iron Mike Tyson" because that's what fans remember. They also didn't know his wild personal life at the time nor his poor training habits.


For Floyd, how come I criticize his moves at 147+ ?
So that is OK but if I do it to Pac it is not?

All you need to do is follow what Roach said as well. Not only before the fight but after with what he said on why Pac was going to win. And you don't have to be that bright to push through some of the bull**** he says. Just match it up with how he handles questions and opinions he gives for other fighters/fights that are not his own.

 

I agree with that but at the end of the day everything needs to be placed in the proper perspective to get a true and accurate account of any situations. Otherwise people will have a warped view of the situation based on only seeing things at a surface level.

 

Doesn't the poll results SAY IT ALL? More than anything one person can say? More than anything a Boy Joy fan can say to back up his manz? Look at the amount of votes.

This does not look good for Boy Joy fans.

 

you are his fan you ***:good

 

iam a big mayweather fan But he is Duck Pac No Doubt !!

 

Indeed.

What I find puzzling, is the way they're bring up drugs. Acting as if it's Pacquiao's fault on this ASSUMPTION he rejected testing...what?!

If he had rejected testing, does anyone seriously think Mayweather, Ellerbe and co. wouldn't be screaming about it from the rooftops? They really think his team, who've worked for years to build this reputation, would say nothing?

Ludicrous.

It's their stance, not Mayweathers.

Apart from that, every source says Pacquiao agreed to full testing! We know for a fact that Mayweather wasn't going to back down, meaning Pacquiao accepted full testing. Assuming Mayweather altered his stance slightly, he would have met Pacquiao in the middle, meaning the testing would be extremely thorough, anyway. Crucially, both sides agreed.

 

LMMFAO @ the 88 knob-slobberers who voted no.

 

Good thing this is gonna happen anyway!