The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

lol. This is the kind of replies you guys come up with when your bull**** is exposed.

 

How about asking for $10M per lb. penalty?

How about demanding a March date when Mayweathe and HBO wanted to do the fight in May?

How about claiming Pac might not be ready for March when Mayweather agreed to fight him in March?

How about agreeing to OSDT, and then going back on it?

How about agreeing to "random testing" only if Pacquiao can choose the number of tests that would be done as well as the dates?

How about filing a lawsuit against Mayweather?

How about claiming Pacquiao needs 30 days to recover from a blood test when he took a blood test 24 days before the Hatton fight?

How about refusing a comprimise on a 14 day cutoff and then lying about it?

How about demanding that Mayweather apologize before the fight can be made?

 

It's not bull****. It's you smelling your upperlip.

 

So, it's ok for Pac to want a level playing field, but not Floyd?

In any event, the weight issue is a complete non factor, as Pac is dug in at 147, along with Floyd.

And Floyd AGREED to the penalties, without any hesitation.

So again, why are you arguing about weight when that was an issue that the 2 teams actually resolved (and no one, be they Pac or Floyd fans, will disagree on that point)?

 

How ironic

 

NSAC requires fighters above 135 pounds to use 10 oz gloves. emmanuel wants 8 oz, and then he goes :| about Floyd trying to change the rules.

 

What are you the spelling police?

The article is full of bias. They select quotes that fit their agenda and then create a timeline that makes it look like Pac is the one who avoided Mayweather. What a load of bull.

Anyone with half a brain who isn't gobbling up Floyd's nutsack can see through this bull****.

 

atsch Why is it you keep bringing this up as if it means anything? Oh wow....Floyd is FORCED to fight at 147 for a WW fight. What a demand to give into! :roll:

 

Lance, no one was talking to you, so shut the **** up.

You wont add anything meaningful anyway, as you never do.

 

So, what is missing or inaccurate from this timeline? I am asking an honest question. If there is anything missing, you can send it to the writer of the article, and if you provide links to articles or vids, they will update said factual information.

I dont see anything missing, but this has been such a labyrinth, it would be easy to miss something.

So what do you disagree with as not be factual?

 

It is quite clear that you have trouble seeing the industry beyond emmanuel's chubby egg roll and 2 dumplings.

 

Considering my post history concerning the drug test demands, you would see that it actually isn't ironic.

 

This is what I want to know and it's been asked pages ago on this thread. Anyone stating it's incorrect please let us know what's wrong and provide links for the source please. And please not some youtube clip, an actual article or interview would be great. :good

 

Team Pacquiao can't live quotes like these down;

"They want Olypic Style Drug Testing. I said 'yeah, no problem'. I said, 'whatever you want'. Since we accepted that, now they're running scared"

-Freddy Roach 12-11-09

"Our reaction is, 'So what?' We know Manny doesn't take any illegal drugs or anything. And none of this is getting under Manny's skin or anything,..I'm here with Manny, and to him, it's like a joke. It's a laughing matter,..It's something foolish anyway. Why would we be concerned? We know he doesn't do any of that s**t."

-Michael Koncz 12-13-09

 

Seriously, why do you keep mentioning that as if it means anything? I've asked you before, yet you bring it up again?

You think that's a 'meaningful' item? It's pretty much irrelevent.