The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

There's a lot more out there... yet you bring nothing again.. Why bother posting all this without bringing anything but the same opinion instead of facts? You've brought a total of.... 0

 

Let's just enjoy boxing.
ESBers overanalyze too much.
Let's be grateful that we have
Manny Pacquiao in our generation.
Enjoy while it lasts.

 

Can You Do Us All A Favor And Provide Us With The Missing Pieces Of Info?

The Timeline Is Rock Solid:goodFact...

I challenge Any *******. Who Disagrees with Any Of The Undisputed Facts In The Timeline to Present Facts With Links To Counter, Instead Of Resorting to Name Calling ANd Other Childish Behaviour> :deal

 

I read through the timeline. It was exactly how i remembered it. I'm curious what pro-Pac info people think was left out? The first negotiations made pac look very bad. When people say that the timeline is pro-Mayweather, they must just be forgetting that the actual events were very pro-Mayweather.

 

I think that's the issue. They all overlook or have forgotten the first round of negotiations since it should be blamed on Pac. Second round can be blamed on Mayweather not agreeing to 7 days, although he already stated he wouldn't. If we go back we should blame both. :thumbsup

 

:deal learn what the **** your talking about, a compromise between Pacquiao woud have taken place during negotiations, Pacquiao telling media that he is willing to take the test up to the fight all the sudden is not a compromise because they are no longer negotiating a fight.
there is a big differece kid~ and what the **** are you talking about regarding stiff demands what Floyd requested is a right to every single licensed fighter....
:dealSee below kid:deal its no wonder you have no job, your ass has no education

This content is protected

This content is protected

a settlement of differences by mutual concessions; an agreement reached by adjustment of conflicting or opposing claims, principles, etc., by reciprocal modification of demands.

This content is protected

the result of such a settlement.

This content is protected

something intermediate between different things: The split-level is a compromise between a ranch house and a multistoried house.

 

He more or less reiterates over and over the points of team Pac rejecting blood testing, and reduces the PED accusations by Team Mayweather..

There was a hell of a lot more than just the one time Floyd Sr. and company accused Pac, yet there was one frame for it..

He states Mayweather offered a PUBLIC invitation for JMM to accept step aside money.. Yet there was no date for JMM either accepting, rejecting, or even hearing about this "offer"..

Plenty references were made stating Pac would not agree to blood testing.. Yet only if you go through every little thing he wrote would you find that team Pac agreed to unlimited urine tests through and up to the fight, even during it.. Why no bold print for this fact??

They had numerous sports nutritionists stating that blood and urine were equal in testing... There were even reports at the time that Epo was easier to detect with urine tests.. There were also reports saying that the HGH tests USADA were not even 100% conclusive... Why no bold print for this??

His timeline was on, it's the points he chooses to leave out.. Then the points he chooses to go over like he's beating the hell out a dead horse..

The article is biased, but it is what it is... You have your mind made up.. so you won't listen to me anyway..

 

Give it a rest bro. Anything that favors Floyd is gospel to these suckers.

 

Yea sometimes.. But some people like to listen, I figure I can at least offer them some truth so they know what's going on.. you know a ******* can make a timeline and leave out little things and keep going over and over the same thing.. in the end it will look the exact opposite. This guy took a lot of time in writing this, so you can't knock him for that.. i'm really interested in his follow up to see if he tells it like it is, or chooses his same method of madness..

 

Show me where I state the timeline was incorect? Chronologically, with the articles he "CHOSE" it's accurate. I'm just saying Ben obviously chose certain pieces that were beneficial to Floyds defense.

I'm just not pressed enough to go jumping through any hoops that you can't yourself. And why would I bring up facts that are already available on the world wide web?:huh

I'm sure I'd learn a lot wasting my time reviewing your posts......but further insight on your shortcomings isn't exactly appealing for some reason. I think I know enough about you where I'm comfortable.

 

Nah almost all of Floyd fans in ESB are rabid. You should not deal with them serriously, once you get to profile them.

 

I'm simply replying to your post kid. Like I said before...it's not my job to save anyone. So by you expecting me to expend needless energy supplying you with information you have access to ain't happening. You are comfortable accepting biased information and that's something I'm cool with. I'm just glad it's not me who ends up looking the fool.

 

HAHA They say the same **** about us What I think it is, On both sides you have the Very Loud fans on both sides that are very vocal.. And when you defend one guy you quickly fall into that category by the other poster.. Then we yell *****, *******, blah blah, very easy to start throwing ****

 

Indeed.

What I love most about *****s is that they love to trow around the "Fact", and "Owned" word.

And yah don't forget the infamous... "Take the test!"

 

:good Yea but admit it, the **** kills the boredom sometimes