The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

So Corrales wasnt in his prime when he won beat him....was not Castillo who went on to become lineal champion again....Hatton was undefeated and a two division champion...you dont take him seriously because he is a dick outside the ring...in the ring he does his job and you cant ask for more than that

 

Sure they need it, and if they don't their test levels are gonna skyrocket and they'll be caught pretty fukin fast unless they're using some test blockers.

 

We have a winner /thread

 

And if that's the case, why bother getting it from the doctor at all -- that's not true TRT whatsoever. That's called juicing.

 

:deal Yeah over hyped loser atsch

 

:rofl sure. were not talking about "greatness" were talking about overrated in terms of TALENT.

now, tell me who would u favor over floyd in THIS ERA?

 

Mayweather's style could give anyone in history hell even in losing. You can't beat that kind of style easily unless it's a lucky one punch KO.

 

TS you can discredit any fighters wins. You should be prepare to provide who you think has a legit career without any flaws when you criticize someone career. It is easy to say or he was too old, too green, too small. But judging of ur new account and few post, u are prolly just a troll.

 

Well I'm obviously not a ******* because I don't rate Pacquiao as the best either of this era either. Both Mayweather and Pacquiao will probably go down in history as "greats" but, do I think they deserve that spot? Not really. I think a great can only be described as someone who fought the best! I don't think either have fought the very, very best to be honest.

 

Also is very disgusting to see a key board warrior question one of the best fighters in history who has been fighting guys all over the world since he was 16 in amatuers, completing in Olympics and in ELite level.

 

Did he go up, stay in that division, and face the very best from that division? No! He moved up, won a title then left. If your the best, you stay in that division and clear it up until you're ready to dominate the next division.

 

TS should understand that boxing will always have stars match with someone too young or too old, or too big or too small. Excuses is easy to find but i don't see how Floyd can be criticize for fighting someone any size for he have fought people bigger moving up in weight not to mention he have fought old as well as young, prime and out of prime. One thing is for sure... he fought guys WHEN THEY WERE RELAVANT TO THE SPORT. He hasn't fight a journyman since WHEN?

 

I hate him since the Ortiz sucker punch but was a fan before. He is overhyped. A washed up DLH almost beat him. Yea, he dominated a totally washed up Mosley, sucker punched his way to a win over Ortiz and ko'd hatton and beat up the smaller marquez. But none of those fights are very legit all things considered when talkin about ATG. He hasn't really had any career defining fights, at least not in YEARS.
Put him in the late 90s and mosley and oscar would tear his head off.

 

Floyd beat DLH 8-4 even 9-3 is acceptable. How is that equals Oscar almost beat him? Not to mention he went up to Oscar's weight who showed up 160+, small ring and big gloves? He was basically a WW fighting a Middle weight. And shane mosley and Oscar would never beat Floyd at any point.

 

To ts - according to you, neither Floyd or PAC is the grreatest fighter of this era, so then who is?