The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,488
    3,673
    May 4, 2012

    [yt]4kXwJo7DWPA[/yt]


    :lol: Another troll exposed. It's like watching a ******* go back and revise their idiot posts.
     
  2. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,128
    Oct 17, 2009
    Marquez could have been 20 pounds heavier, it wasn't functional size. He didn't have the frame, nor the height, nor the reach.

    Cotto, Corely, Judah, Augustus, Hatton, Castillo (even the rematch), Ortiz (inside of 4 rounds), De La Hoya.

    What do they have in common? Two things: they were all less skilled than Juan Manuel Marquez, and they all did better against Mayweather than Juan Manuel Marquez. Skill cannot be the determinative factor. I give Floyd credit for using his skill and stylistic strengths, but having those advantages against a much naturally smaller man do take away from it.

    His performances somewhat justify and redeem his picks. In the grand scheme of things beating Mosley at that stage and JMM at his first fight at welter weren't great wins, but his performances were great performances. The wins might have been replicated by a host of fighters, but the performances likely couldn't.
     
  3. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,488
    3,673
    May 4, 2012
    - Explain to me please how Maquez weighing in on welterweight and Floyd weighing in on welterweight on Fight night would have changed the outcome, naturally? Marquez cut MUCH more to fight Pac than floyd ever did to fight Castillo.


    - Saying one isn't more skilled than the other is crazy talk. Marquez and Floyd competed only 4 lbs from eachother on the same card, in world title bouts. Oscar has a better jab than Marquez, and a better chin than Marquez, he was able to reach Floyd on occasion because he didn't have to fear any ammo coming back.

    -Because Floyd used superior footwork and a longer jab doesn't mean size ruled. we'd be saying the same for Norwood because it was his defense and style that caused the problems.
     
  4. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010

    :rofl:patsch and guess what? Who was Shane's next fight :lol:

    he should be embarrassed :lol:
     
  5. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,488
    3,673
    May 4, 2012
    Not embarrassed if you only pay attention to Kenny one day and not the other :lol:
     
  6. raichu

    raichu Guest


    Castillo hit him with a few body shots, wow

    Mayweather hit him in the face.

    judges got it right, move on
     
  7. Skullrip

    Skullrip Active Member Full Member

    956
    0
    May 16, 2012
    the bigger question is WHY DO PAC-HATERS DISCREDIT MANNY'S WINS EVERYTIME?
     
  8. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,128
    Oct 17, 2009
    - I'm not sure what you're arguing about weighing in at welter. Floyd simply wears more weight better. People are assuming Marquez can just stroll in without having to cut weight and he'll be fine and dandy. But his frame is naturally much smaller, so when going up against someone who can punch at welter and possibly bully him around, he logically chose to build, and it hurt him. I don't think the fight would have looked much different, but if Floyd were forced to shed those last two pounds, it at least would have been more fair to Marquez. This is the wrong era to match them up H2H anyway. We've had that discussion before.



    -IMO Floyd is more skilled and Marquez has a sightly higher ring IQ. But that's irrelevant. My argument is that skill is not the sole determining factor. Mayweather's style and his advantages in size and length greatly contributed. Again, Cotto, Corely, Jesus Chavez, Augustus, De La Hoya, Hatton, Judah, Ortiz-all less skilled than Marquez, and they were able to have more offensive success. It definitely allowed Mayweather to dominate the way he did, but that kind of dominance was not at all indicative of a their comparison in skill level.

    -IMO Marquez is the better defensive ring general, but Floyd's defensive footwork is much better than Marquez's ability to cut off a ring and apply pressure on the front foot. There's clearly a style advantage for Floyd, I'm not disputing that. The fight might look different at another time but I'm not going to argue people who pick Floyd at any weight.
     
  9. LACMEXAME

    LACMEXAME Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,106
    0
    Jan 2, 2013
    YUp
     
  10. LACMEXAME

    LACMEXAME Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,106
    0
    Jan 2, 2013
    Bogo making sense again.
     
  11. LACMEXAME

    LACMEXAME Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,106
    0
    Jan 2, 2013
    It's ****ing obvious Marquez was struggling with the weight. It's also obvious that May had all the physical advantages. Not sure what the argument is. Great points once again. Bogo, one of the few cats that have common sense.
     
  12. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    :good
     
  13. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    His win over Hatton too. I bet there the same people saying that Bradley is a more deserving oppoent than Guerrero is for Mayweather this coming May.
    Like Hatton, Bradley was the top man at 140. Like Hatton, Bradley did not look Great in wining a championship at 147.
     
  14. Tenorio

    Tenorio Bona fide Flomo Full Member

    679
    1
    Apr 7, 2007
    Mayweather aka the GOAT is never wrong.
     
  15. NWS

    NWS Guest

    He's not getting in.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.