The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Brian Nielsen was 49-0 at one stage of his career. What's your point?

 

I think he sees something in his style that worries him. Not that he could lose but that he cant shut him out like he does with others but would need to go to war in order to win thats why he talks about health issues when asked about Pac.

 

Fight has been blown outta proportion now... its a guaranteed letdown.
It's Godfather 3, It's Star Wars episode 1, It's "Chinese Democracy"... get it.

Floyd understands this that's why he has all his money & Manny don't.

 

Stopped reading here. Would that be the same Wilt Chamberlain who won 2 rings to Bill Russell's 11?

 

There was no blueprint

 

That would be the Wilt Chamberlain who never played with more than 2 HOF teammates compared to the Bill Russell who never played with less than 4 HOF teammates.

Team sports vs. individual sports.... Comparisons end with "sports."

 

Of course it's not a valid comparison. It's also not valid to call Chamberlain "dominant" in anything other than statlines. At least not when comparing him to Floyd. Floyd's dominance is in victories and titles. Chamberlain clearly didn't dominate a "weak era", because the Celtics were stacked.

 

This guy knows everything!!
What's the point of discussion?

Although he has a point, mayweather resume is diabolical.

 

What did Mayweather Sr say.

"I don't like my son fighting southwpaws..."

Truth is right there

 

Floyd made Hatton go up to 147 where he had never fought at before

Pac fought Hatton at Hatton's best weight, where he was undefeated and Champion at.

 

So, do all 2 pound catchweights not make a difference? Or only certain ones when it applies to your argument?

Yes, Floyd vs. JMM was set to be at 144. It was increased to the WW limit a few days BEFORE the weigh in with a rumored payoff between 600k and 1.2 million. JMM agreed to it, so it's not as though Floyd missed weight.

Hatton did have the fight with Collazo at WW a year before. He didn't look good, though.

Hatton was unbeaten at 140 and was indeed still the lineal champion. However, nothing I said is untrue or warranting being quoted to try to correct something. Hatton had just been sparked out 18 months before by Floyd.

Glad to read back on the thread and see I made the best contribution.

Not being quoted is a good thing more often than not.

 

all floyds wins were/are better
AND this is due to the fact ALL were in much better condition mentally AND physically..

any1 trying to make any argument and i MEAN ANY argument against these facts are flat out floyd haters. fact

 

You sound like a dumbass saying "fact" all the time when it is clearly a matter of opinion.

While I agree with you on 4/5 of the opponents discussed, it certainly is up to the beholder. As are almost all factors involved in boxing.

If they think Pac's wins over Oscar, Hatton, Mosley, or Marquez were somehow better then Floyd's, then their opinion means nothing. However, it is still an opinion, not a fact.

 

boxing_Novice,
when you created this 10000th mayweather thread did you think it through at all ? how could you not have known it would blown up your face ? are you that lost ? well, you dont know anything else boxing related so maybe you were just making another ***** thread

or this is just more love for floyd from you.. this is one of your very best PRO floyd threads. stop kissing floyds A$$..you come off too much as a *****

*****

 

:good