The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ArseBandit

    ArseBandit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,555
    2,376
    Apr 22, 2012
    Do you actually believe that?
    No one is unbeatable. He's not a God ffs.
     
  2. El Chicano

    El Chicano Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,506
    1,821
    Apr 29, 2013
    People will be demanding the fight....

    Do u have confidence it can be made?!!!
     
  3. boxsensei

    boxsensei Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    82
    Oct 19, 2008
    Floyd is ducking every fighter in the sport until he fights them then it turns into a cherry pick.
     
  4. ElCyclon

    ElCyclon Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,260
    13,597
    Dec 2, 2012

    You are almost there.:deal
     
  5. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011

    Pacquiao is still a big treat to Mayweather, obviously Mayweather has a lot of excuses.

    keep ducking :deal
     
  6. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011


    I agree,

    Mayweather-Alvarez... clearly Mayweather has the edge once again with the fight @ 152.

    Drained the ''young & hungry'' champion who after the Mayweather fight fought Angulo and couldn't even make 154 and made Angulo sign a new contract for the weigh to be @ 155. :deal
     
  7. M.3

    M.3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,196
    355
    Mar 21, 2014
    Wow.. You went from simply using pieces of what he said to misinterpret him to just adding things to make it sound worse.. Are you really that mad at a guy didn't fight another guy? No way you can be that upset at him bro...
     
  8. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011


    Mayweather calls Pacquiao a ''has been and has LOSSES'' but Mayweather fighting Khan or Collazo in September is a joke of a fight.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,225
    48,520
    Mar 21, 2007
    Enough to make you hope Bradley ****ing wins.
     
  10. make_the_weight

    make_the_weight Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,433
    26
    Mar 21, 2009
    Probably be Bradley vs PAC vs JMM 3/4/5/6/7/8 before PAC Vs May
     
  11. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    If Pac wins (I don't think he will), then he'd have to take down Marquez for it to be in demand. If he beats Bradley and Marquez convincingly I think the hype would be back, and it would be justifiable.
     
  12. The13thRound

    The13thRound Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,403
    43
    May 4, 2009
    It's not only who you fight but WHEN you fight them and at which weight.

    A win over a prime cotto at his best weight is worth more than a battle weary catchweight cotto just as an example.

    People act like mayweather faced the mosley that did that to margarito BUT IT WAS A WHOLE 2 years later ffs

    Yall musta forgot about mayweathers convenient retirements when the seas are looking choppy.

    I'll never give floyd credit because he simply avoids genuine threats or waits until the threats less.
    He gets props for canelo but I was never blown away by canelo anyway always said he has bad stamina and isn't all that.

    To me canelo is like a slightly better kell brook but with just as bad stamina lots of smoke and mirrors in boxing.
     
  13. yingyang

    yingyang Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    0
    Sep 21, 2010
    Bradley will beat Pac this time. So we dont get to see PAC vs JMM 5/6/7/8/9.
    F@ck recycled fight. and F@ck Arum.
     
  14. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    :good
     
  15. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    Damn it i meant fighters that people thought Mayweather would never fight and he did. How u change title?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.