The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ValentinePrince

    ValentinePrince Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    32
    Nov 21, 2013
    Marquez and Mayweather are very different fighters. Marquez likes to sit in the pocket and trade. He hits harder than Mayweather and throws much punches (especially a lot more combinations). Marquez would eat Chino up. He handles pressure much better.

    Mayweather likes to fight with distance. He's more defensive and elusive than Marquez, but actually inferior at the act of counterpunching. He doesn't like it when guys can close down the gap his obscenely long arms afford him. He doesn't like fighters that crowd him and exploit his low activity.

    Mayweather > Marquez

    Marquez > Chino

    Chino = Mayweather

    Superior version of Chino (i.e. Pacquiao) > Mayweather
     
  2. leftleftright

    leftleftright Active Member Full Member

    746
    0
    Apr 12, 2012
    Pacquiao has a record of vulnerability to counterpunchers. This fight raises issues with Duran but not Pacquiao.
     
  3. wylan911

    wylan911 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,775
    53
    Sep 27, 2013
    You nimwitted *******s. Maidana possessed something over Floyd that Pacquiao does not size and strength, thats what caused the problems, and Floyd still won. Your points are invalid, end of story...
     
  4. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Pac would knock Void out and Void knows it. Void, Sr. said that Void, Jr. would never fight Pac, he said that right after Pac stopped Cotto, something that Void could not do. Cotto bloodied Void, Pac stopped Cotto..........

    Golovkin would knock Void out, said he would fight Void at 154. Martinez said he would fight Void at 154 or even 150, but Void ran, now we know why..........
     
  5. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011
    Pressure pressure, that's all PAC needs. He has the stamina to go all 12 rounds throwing punches t Mayweather all night. Mayweather a duck!!!!!!!!
     
  6. shoe

    shoe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,560
    563
    Dec 2, 2013
    pac would light floyd up. tyson was right, froyd's scared of him.
     
  7. sabor

    sabor Active Member Full Member

    983
    23
    Nov 12, 2010
    he is TBE. Maidana is the 2nd TBE. Its irrefutable.
     
  8. modernfonzie

    modernfonzie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,595
    8
    Aug 25, 2013
    With them wraps? absolutely.

    The one that Pac fought? Hell no.
     
  9. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,103
    5,575
    Nov 5, 2013
    37 years old, huge real life problems, still won clearly

    :hi:
     
  10. tdubb

    tdubb Active Member Full Member

    601
    0
    Jan 5, 2008
    Manny wouldve shyyted on Floyd tonight.
     
  11. Tekniqs

    Tekniqs Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,911
    4
    Aug 12, 2010
    he threw at different angles while he had floyd along the ropes..which is something Pac doesn't do. He doesn't bully opponents into the ropes and wrestle them to keep them there
     
  12. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    Very true :lol:
     
  13. soulless

    soulless New Member Full Member

    36
    0
    May 3, 2014
    the butthurt Floyd fanboys. Floyd looked sloppy. i got $$ on pac and i'm not even a pac fan. i expected Floyd to easily walk through maidana tonight.
     
  14. Holy Grail

    Holy Grail Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,055
    52
    Sep 13, 2013
    That TBE title is completely a joke now. :rofl
     
  15. Capt

    Capt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,906
    45
    Jul 12, 2013
    Pacquiao wouldn't fight like Maidana, as in fight on the ropes. He would try and out point Floyd in the middle, which floyd still seems to dominate. Also Pacquiao wouldn't throw that many punches at Floyd anyway.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.