The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    They're both just getting old and are bound to lose soon.
     
  2. YCGS

    YCGS Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,067
    1,270
    Sep 13, 2013
    This.

    Taking their styles into effect, I would say that Pacquiao is affected more by his decline than Mayweather because of his more aggressive style.
     
  3. RSBonos

    RSBonos Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,422
    123
    Feb 27, 2008
    May has noticeably slowed down since last year. He's an aging fighter.
     
  4. Dilly

    Dilly Member Full Member

    306
    1
    Mar 28, 2008
    I think Cory Spinks gets into the Hall before Pacquiao does.
     
  5. shanahan14

    shanahan14 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,488
    731
    Jul 5, 2011
    Did Sinatra pull a lot of tail?
     
  6. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Is the pope catholic?
     
  7. Tancred

    Tancred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,338
    4
    May 2, 2014
    Yes , is there really a need to ask the question
     
  8. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,160
    5,372
    May 22, 2011

    :lol::lol: That's just plain cold blooded.
     
  9. GeoffJ

    GeoffJ Active Member Full Member

    980
    1
    Dec 25, 2013
    I'm willing to attempt an answer but only after the Algieri fight though I'm not sure how much it will tell us as Algieri's never really done anything.
     
  10. shanahan14

    shanahan14 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,488
    731
    Jul 5, 2011
    First off, no.

    Second, even by your flawed logic, he should be 1-1 because there was no way he won the 1st.

    Third, it's clear Pac should be 2-0. Hence the biggest public outrage regarding a fight in the history of boxing.

    Finally, you can do a better job of trolling.
     
  11. Jeff3300

    Jeff3300 Guest

    My scorecard -


    RD1: either
    RD2: either, kinda Bradley?
    RD3: Pacquiao
    RD4: Bradley
    RD5: Bradley
    RD6: Bradley
    RD7: Pacquiao
    RD8: Bradley, but didn’t win big
    RD9: Pacquiao
    RD10: Pacquiao
    RD11: either
    RD12: either

    Could’ve seen it either.. 8-4 Pacquiao OR 8-4 Bradley OR a draw.
    Judges had it 8-4, 8-4, 10-2 for Pacquiao. The 10-2 score is nonsense, but I agree with the 8-4.
     
  12. jim jim

    jim jim Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    4
    Jun 2, 2014
    the commenataros were way too kind to pacquio in that fight, i dont think bradley won but there were some rounds which were tight with bradley landing the cleaner punches that the commentators acted like pac won easy, ive lost track with how people score fights cant see how people can think pacquio dominated this fight and brook dominated porter , as rounds were given to pacquio on agression
     
  13. Bradley definitely won the fight.

    Pacquiao put up a fight and that's why it's swept under the rug.
     
  14. anthoto1

    anthoto1 Active Member Full Member

    705
    570
    Apr 13, 2013
    I agree. I have it a shutout for Bradley watching the fight with my eyes closed.
     
  15. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    37,904
    7,499
    Sep 2, 2011
    I have it the other way round, Pac clearly got robbed in the first fight, second fight was also a clear win for Pacquiao.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.