The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Are you serious with this comment? Seriously? Read that mess outloud.

 

saying both pac and Floyd are liars is crazy there are countless proofs of Floyd lying

 

Its clear to me that floyd and bob arent agreeing on sonething. He's told manny to go out into the press and make it appear as though floyd is ducking again to try force maywesther into agreeing. Floyd says hes the A side so probsbpy doesn't feel he should be sgreeing to anything.

 

So let me get this straight from you, you think manny is lying when he challenged floyd and he is lying when he wants floyd to sigb the fight until january?

 

I don't need to 'beat that' you idiot. What floyd did was despicable and is the act of a weak man. I'm not comparing the seriousness of what each of them did.

Doesn't change the fact that cheating on your wife makes you completely untrustworthy, hence the fact I believe neither of them.

 

Ariza is a yes-man to whoever is paying him.

 

So let me get this straight from you, you think manny is lying when he challenged floyd and he is lying when he wants floyd to sign the fight until january?

 

I've already said I trust neither of them, he may well be genuine but why would I trust what he says when he's happily lied in the past? What don't you get about that.

I'm not defending floyd (you're a moron if you believe that). I'm just refusing to take a side.

 

so Floyd and pac both lie on the same level?

Floyd has been proven to lie countless times you the only thing you said about pac was he lied to his wife when he cheated on heratsch

that is not the same as how Floyd has lied in the past

Floyd is a pathological liar he can not be trusted

 

so you won't believe that pac wants floyd to sign the fight just because he admitted on cheating with his wife? So what do you think pac really wants? For floyd not to sign the fight? you're a funny dude.

 

It's not about levels of lying.

Why do you insist on always drawing your own conclusions to other peoples opinions?

 

I'm trying to portray how ridiculous his points are. Pac said he wants floyd to sign the fight soon. He said that he doesn't believe pac because he admitted on cheating on his wife. So if he thinks pac is lying, it means he believes that pac doesn't want floyd to sign. It's silly right?

 

Pacquiao saying 'sign the fight' is irrelevant as we don't know what's really happening behind the scenes or who's really stalling.

I'm saying he has no problem lying. He may well be genuine but he clearly can't be trusted to always tell the truth, and as there's no hard evidence from either side, what reason would I have to believe either of them?

One of them is obviously telling the truth and one of them lying, but we have no reason or evidence to know which one, why would I choose a side other than 'I'm a fan of this one so il believe him'. Unfortunately I don't care for either so I won't be doing that.

I'm genuinely gob smacked you can't grasp this concept. Surely you're not thick?

 

I think that's exactly what it is.