The all things technical thread.

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by slip&counter, Feb 5, 2012.


  1. pong

    pong Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    1
    May 11, 2011
    mares is a dirty little fighter ward can be aswell.even al bernstein mentioned it in mares last fight and al don't make rash decisions
     
  2. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    Spot on Slip, I saw the highlights of the fight and it was embarrassing to see. Even Darchinyian complained about Mares straying low..

    I sparred my mate about 6 months back and i like to body punch even as a kid. He's 6'2 and i'm 5'9/5'10 so i'm the little guy in this, I threw a uppercut to body and he leaned and hopped back from it. Caught him right on his piece i'd say due to him changing range from mid to long and extension of my glove caught him. First thing i did was show out to him with the glove, we touched gloves and i made sure i kept my work up.

    I've seen better bodypunchers then Mares not stray low consistently like his has.

    Yep agreed. My missus woke up while i was watching the Moreno fight an she said halfway through ''that little guy is dirty, he's hitting low a lot''. That video Slip posted shows how much Mares knows a low blow can debilitate a fighter.

    He's good fighter not doubting that but don't like the dirtyness. Horrible to see IMHO.
     
  3. JFT96

    JFT96 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,636
    1
    Apr 27, 2010
    Apologies, I wasn't referring to you slip in that post calling him a scumbag :good. But I have seen stuff like that posted about him on ESB before & it's an overreaction IMO
     
  4. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    He's a dirty fighter. So was Pedroza though, although he was brilliant so I let him off ;-)
     
  6. Dennison

    Dennison Guru Full Member

    3,086
    1
    Oct 24, 2011
    Seen a few videos of Hopkins talking and he knows so much technically, think he would make a VERY good trainer
     
  7. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    18
    Jul 23, 2008
    No worries, J. :good

    Hopkins is a master, but i think he'd be a better advisor than a trainer. I don't think he'd have the patience to be an effective trainer and work with someone day in day out from the get-go.

    It's rare that great fighters turn into great trainers for that reason.
     
  8. norfolkinchance

    norfolkinchance Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    1
    Mar 28, 2009
    i thin k hopkins would be superb too.

    and he improved himself and his bag of tricks too as his career progressed so think he could pass it onto others.
     
  9. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    18
    Jul 23, 2008
    I love Pedroza, so i let him off too. But my word he was dirty. :lol:

    For me Pedroza is no worse than the 6th or 7th greatest featherweight ever. He was a wonderful fighter. It’s a shame we never got to see him against Sanchez, Gomez or even Azumah Nelson. Had he beat one of those 3, his historical status would have sky rocketed. As it sits he’s still an all time great.

    I think he would have been a handful for all three. Maybe a bit controversial, but i think he may have beaten Salvador Sanchez (and i love Sanchez even more). Sanchez liked to counterpunch and Pedroza would have laid back, i think he would've edged a super close decision. Imagine that historically. WOW!

    I think Pedroza gets lost in the sauce because he wasn’t always exciting. He sort of did just enough to win, changing his style like a chameleon depending on the opponent. Sort of like a Bernard Hopkins, but he didn’t speak English and he didn’t have the charisma of say a Duran.
     
  10. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    18
    Jul 23, 2008
    Fellas, this is Amir Khan workout with Virgil Hunter if anyone is interested or would like to give their thoughts. What i've noticed from this is that Virgil is trying to get Khan to throw curve balls by not fighting at the same speed all the time, but mixing his punches up. Trying to also improve his ring generalship. The other thing i noticed is he's teaching him the basic blocking technique. Getting him to block punches and then counter back quickly. This is something i've NEVER seen Khan working on. With Freddie Roach it seemed like everything was at the same pace and he wasn't worrying about what was coming back. I'd be surprised if anyone actually even taught him how to block a punch as Hunter is doing here.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fbpxv9ojDo8[/ame]


    Blocking is the most basic of boxing defense. It's the best defensive technique for Khan because it's the easiest to learn the quickiest and doesn't require a lot of natural defensive reflexes which Khan doesn't have. Blocking for me is also the easiest way to defend without taking yourself out of range and requires little energy.

    That's the reason i think Hunter has chosen blocking for Khan. Blocking is not a first defensive skill, it’s a first COUNTER OFFENSIVE skill. You see Hunter throwing punches at Khan and Khan simply covers his vulnerable areas, doesn't try to “catch” the punch, and fires back after he blocks. Blocking also covers both head and body and doesn’t leave you open to follow up punches.

    It remains to be seen how Khan transfers this to a real fight. I personally think he has too many bad habits and they're too ingrained for him to improve significantly enough. But Virgil Hunter is a genius of a trainer.
     
  11. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    19
    Jan 29, 2011
    Dont know if you caught this Slip, a behind the ropes special that was on earlier tonight that has some really good sections. I found it fascinating watching Hunter working with Khan, he's such an interesting man to listen to.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqKzy40fn5w&feature=plcp[/ame]
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    I love Pedroza and think he'd have beaten Sal' but I'm not sure he's really all that great a featherweight.

    Marcel looks better on film.

    Of course I uploaded a fair bit of Pedroza to YouTube; love the guy. But he wasn't the no.1 feather for all that long, never faced the no.1/2 and his best opponent (Lockridge) ran him VERY close, twice.

    Still, if anyone has seen Sanchez struggle with Ford and then seen Pedroza outclass him to the point of embarrassment they'll know how good the Panamanian was.

    Sanchez struggled against quick jabbers anyway; Castillo gave him a LOT of hassle, which the Sal' fanboys don't like to mention.
     
  13. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    Khan will learn nothing from him. Watched it, kid is thick as pig**** despite Hunters good intentions.

    Also, Hunter is an arrogant nob.
     
  14. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    18
    Jul 23, 2008
    As i say i think he's for me the 6th or 7th greatest featherweight ever. 7 years as champ. Record title defenses, which he should get a lot more credit for. Juan La Porte, Lockridge, Taylor, Lujan, Royal Kobashi, Ford all good names. The level of his opposition was on the most part very good. But that's why it would've been great to seem him with the likes of Sanchez, Gomez and Nelson. History changing bouts they would have been.

    He was really a complete fighter, maybe sometimes we put too much emphasis on him being 'dirty' but he was MUCH more than that. A chameleon, very talented and skilled. Freak of a featherweight with his height, output and aggression and he was also very smart.

    What makes him even better for me is. Pedroza was knocked out cold 3 times before he ever won the featherweight title while he was a bantamweight. He was around 19 or 20 years old at the time. He moved up to featherweight, became more savvy, more of a technician and was never stopped again in the last 16 years of his career.

    Just a man, who as i say gets lost in the sauce of all those other great names at the time.
     
  15. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    18
    Jul 23, 2008
    Cheers for that, Mo. I'll watch it later. :good

    You got any thoughts on what you've seen?

    It's a shame Khan never found someone like Hunter earlier, as i fear it may be too late for him. Also, I don't know if this is true, but i was told that Khan's first choice was Naseem Richardson, but Naseem told him he was fighting at the wrong weight and he would only train him if he moved up. But Khan disagreed and said he wanted to stay at light welter.