The American Anti-Klitschko campaign.. AS STRONG AS EVER.

Yes he would, bad style matchup for Frazier.

Frazier has the best win though, and the better resume over all.

 

True. I don't see another Ali coming along anytime soon so it's very hard to compete with that.

 

Excellent post, mate.

I really do think that you can have this opinion yet still be pro-Wlad. I don't look at that post and see you as hating or anything like that, I just think it's the truth. People get offended when you say Wlad has fought nobody, yet it's not a criticism because he has fought who is out there. This sort of post is just saynig that there are faults in Wlad, which there clearly are, yet it's easy to get accused of being a hater because of it.

I rate Wlad as a fighter but, as I said earlier, he has faults and those faults are the reason he hasn't been seen as the fighter he possibly should be.

Great post though :good

 

Yes, beating a paper champ with a handful of fights at the weight will most certainly elevate him above the man who handed Ali his first defeat :rofl:rofl:rofl

You ****ing Klit-ites....patsch

 

I'm a Klitschko fan, but I must agree with the above. I don't know anyone who hates them, just a lot of people who don't know of them.

 

Don't forget wlad beat ibragimov who beat holyfield. Overall wlad has much richer resume, and H2H wlad destroys frazier in simillar fashion to byrd's destruction.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

Quote of the week material right there.

 

I think what you meant to say is...

HBO, American media, ect. -- not big fans of boring sports figures, no question.

 

The Klitschko's are just the wrong color for HBO...

 

Will you shut the **** up with this ****? How many times have I posted that HBO backed tyhe Klitschkos more than MANY other fighters?! Seriously, look at Alexander or Bradley. They were young, black, undefeated and haven't had anything like the promotion than the Klitschkos have had.

Sure, in the end, HBO said "It's not worth it" but they gave the brothers every chance to become a success and they blew it.

 

:good

 

Yes, that's all kliczkos fault, they should be fighting at least half as spectacular as B hop, mayweather, alexander, kirkland, berto, chad dawson. Infact mayweather sales much more ppv than manny because his fights are way more action packed.

 

The problem with Vitali was the amount of stalling in his career. At the time of the Rahman farce, everyone was calling him a coward because of the amount of times he pulled out. Even if they were legit injuries, he continued to **** people off. Eventually, the momentum he built up against Lewis, Williams etc., was gone.

And you're right, they don't want a smart heavyweight.

 

The reason HBO doesn't back the Klits is that no one in America wants to watch them. This is likely because they have no personality and a boring, safety-first style, despite dwarfing all of their opponents. Shocking really.

 

Seriuosly, and I say this with no hate or malice, The Klitschkos are B+ fighters in a C- heavyweight Era. They are ok, ut they both have losses that expose that they would only be contenders in a solid heavywieght division.

Vitali loses to Byrd and and washed up Lewis.

Wlad, got KO'd 3 times by journeymen.

Those glaring facts will ALLWAYS get in the way of them being considered ATG. And they haven't really accomplished anything special in this miserable heavyweight division.