I don't have to waste my time composing an extensive argument to prove that you're an ass. I'm sure that anyone who has read your posts will back me up.
it's pretty simple really sues.your a superpower, basically the worlds only superpower and you're going to attract ****,wether it be in sport,politics,economics or tiddlywinks it comes with the territory.us brits got it for a helluva long time and even today when we havn't been a superpower for a long,long,time we still attract **** as the old colonial power.get used to it it's part of the deal.
Eh, did you qote the right post. I don't think Deram said that... But of course people are more interested in fighters from their own country. And sometimes one guy can derail a whole thread by making an insane and biased analysis, causing levelheaded people to grab for their guns to "even out the balance". I definately feel that way sometimes, when one fighter gets all the praise.
How old are you? Seriously. I spent twenty minutes writing a big long reply to each of your pointsbut I'm not going to post it because this is the BS logic "flame war" logic that this thread is talking about. I will say one thing. You admit that you will back a guy like Tszu over Whitiker even if you think that pea would have his number. Well thats crap. And its not crap becaues your anti american its crap because you are agruing from an illogical position, which means no matter how hard you try you will inevitably start using unreasonable and illogical arguements to back your point of view up. And there is nothing more annoying then someone who is being unreasonable. So please leave your biases at the door.
First of all I only perused your post because it was rambling and to damn long. However, from what I did read. I have come to the conclusion that with out a doubt you are a ****ing idiot.
No, he didn't. However, he has in plenty of his other posts, and I have no compunction about admiting that I used the fact that he showed up in this thread to take a shot at him. :good
I know for a fact that I have had to defend a post or 2 of mine simply because there is always someone saying something about American bias, or I only picked this fighter because he is American. I also know for a fact that there are a couple of particular posters who bring it up every thread. If you feel it is your AGENDA and NEED to defend against American bias (even when it's not there and something you are imagining) then don't be surprised when someone calls you out about your own bias. There is a bias in EVERY country about their own fighters. But it's not often you hear a Brit talking about a Argentenian bias. And if you are American, and can't figure out that their are other good fighters elsewhere, well you deserve what you get. But it's THAT poster who is biased, he is not a representation of Americans. Lastly....you cannot call Lacy a hype job and then ask for credit for beating him. I never thought Lacy was great and picked Calzaghe to win. If Lacy was an "American hype job" then you are implying that he wasn't very good....Calzaghe nor anyone else is going to get credit for beating a "Hype Job".
You need to back up these comments-I havent seen anything remotely racist from the UK posters..if someone says something like ' you will be using your flag to wipe away your tears' etc..its just banter..dont play the race card, there is nothing worse:-(
Calzaghe ko1 Prime Jones Only messing. Your actually, imo, one of the best posters on here and I admire the way you try to keep an objective view at all times. My whole problem with any bias, be it American or anti-American is that people get critiscised for WHERE they fight instead of WHO they fight. Why should it matter if anyone fights at home their entire career. Afterall, there is such a thing as DVD'S or T.V or the interent. You get to see whatever fighter you wish to see. Does Hatton beating Castillo in LV garner him more credit than beating him in U.K? Does Hopkins beating Eastman in America get him less credit than beating him in England? Or be it an Asian fighter or South American or whomever. It's all about the quality of opposition, not quality of venue.
I have noticeted an anti-American sentiment hear that has nothing to do with boxing. Like all hate it is unrational and unjunustified. Even though those who hate will allways make up excuseses.
:-( Because if you don't fawn over Wlad and Vitlay and hail them as the best HWs of all time, you must be a racist or a xenophobe or both, right? I really want to like the Klitschkos, but I've noticed on this site and others that if you attempt to proffer any critical analysis of their places in history or refute claims by their most ardent supporters, the name calling and crying starts. Now, there are plenty of people who do in fact take shots at the Klitschkos non-stop, but I honestly believe that the majority of them are just doing it to take the **** out of their wack job fanbase. Discussions involving the brothers are usually ridiculous, so I do my best to avoid them. Edited for grammar.
I don't know what ****ing threads you've been reading, but I've seen plenty of people complaining about "anti-white" racism in America after Hatton's most recent fights. Just look up the threads that were started post Castillo. And the ridiculous part about that is that they were claiming that the Americans were upset because he beat a Mexican fighter. And for the record, we aren't "playing the race card" by pointing out the fact that there are people who are making preposterous accusations of racism. :nono They are. And you're right, there is nothing worse than attempt to besmirch someone's character just because you're a crybaby who can't deal with differing opinions. Nice try to flip the discussion around though.
Moaning on about how everything is so anti-American - give it a rest you yank! If there's any particular animosity towards the US on these pages I haven't seen it. So why don't you take your ******ed new world views and clear off back to that hole of a country you call home.