The author of this article deserves to be shot

I didnt know this about McClellan & the dogs, he`s a little worm if this is true which is highly likely.

 

:good

 

Wow, what the **** is wrong with this author?

 

this is deffo true been hearing about this for years

 

:happycouldn't say it better myself

 

man the tone is so harsh as if mcclellan raped a woman then killed her. the hate in the article is disproportionate to say the least.

 

No, humans are not animals. What seperates humans from other animals is the fact the we are the only species that has a neocortex...the most advanced part of the brain.

This article was clearly written by a peta advocate, who are usually so massively disillusioned by their own uncontrollable emotions that they turn into complete hypocrites. They will actually kill a human at protests who disagree with them, or act violently towards another human but then say its not ok to hurt or kill dogs...make sense? Its like some sick twisted cult where animals are worshipped more than human life.

I personally think McClellan was an ******* for what he did and Michael Vick as well. Im completely against animal abuse of any kind. However, if it came between crashing my car with my daughter inside or running over an animal...Im running over the animal.

Furthermore, while McClellan may have been an ******* for what he did with dogs an dpossibly an ******* in general, the fact remains people are a product of their social upbringing. People need to understand thats more than likely how he was raised so he saw no problem in behaving that way. However, as someone stated before, after one of his favorite pitbulls was hurt, it changed his belief on it an dhe stopped doing it.

To say that "God smote" him for doing this is clearly irrational. The author is a ****ing idiot. Thats like boxers thanking "God" for letting them win the fight, like "God" bets on boxing and picked them. If the author understood or was even somewhat knowledgable on religion at will and wasnt out to just get an emotional rise out of people, he would realize how stupid he sounds.

 

The author must really hate the Koreans, they eat dogs.

 

:think Honestly, i almost agree with you...but can't help but feel compassion for the G_man too...

 

What is all the hubbub about. The dude is entitled to his opinion. He obviously loves animals. He finds it fitting that the animal killer was struck down with a brain injury. Obviously they are unrelated. Do I feel sorry for the guy, yes. Do I find him an acceptable human being No. We as humans generally know right from wrong. Fighting dogs is wrong. Running over Flamingo's is wrong. The guy obviously was a bit of a sociopath. While I can feel sorry for the guy, I don't feel all that sorry. It isn't like he was a great human.

 

Agreed. To say he actually deserves what happened to him because of it, is a bit of a stretch for me though.

 

:rofl That ****ing author really loves dogs eh?

 

The moral of that authors story is 2 part:

Don't abuse dogs
Don't drop your right while hooking :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

I don't even know what to make of the author right now, he is clearly a bit sick but seems to have a good sense of humor as well

 

That's not what i happened though, when the dog lost he was actually mad and shot him. Its what i heard anyway.