The best British boxer ever.

I think you are a sick bitter liar, who didn't even see I received yesterday 6 likes (for about 2 postings). Though you give yourself with your multiple profiles here likes, as we know you use to to it.

 

Okay, I decimated you in my last post and this is all you’ve got? How bloody boring.

Where are your SOURCES aside from those you’ve concocted in your head?

I am and have always been the one and only Pugguy. Yes, breathe it in.

I support my own opinion with reading of the facts, logic and provision of the source material I have read when appropriate -

WHERE are your source references - yes, again, I hear the crickets.

I am aware of contributions made under the names McVey and Tonto62. What has that got to do with the price of fish? - clearly you and your argument are flounder-ing and you’re trying to mis-direct.

Since YOU’VE gone there, contributions made under said names have reflected extensive knowledge and logic you’ll never know.

So you moved from plaster of paris, loaded gloves and now to your own animus toward a fellow poster(s) and false accusation re my own good self. I am mortified. Not.

You’re refuting or more accurately, IGNORING the contemporary articles. LOL.

As per those articles - wraps checked, gloves checked. No suspicious attempt on the part of team Jeff to check gloves after fight - in fact, it is Jeff who leaves ring and has to be called back. Fitz shakes hands with Jeff (read that again, with a wrapped hand - god forbid!), announces it to be his last fight - throws gloves to audience as keepsakes - incredibly fishy - just as well the railway spike in glove A or B or both didn’t knock a crowd member out - and just as well the lucky crowd members also kept hush on the loading when in receipt of the gloves. Just as well too too that other opponents kept hush on their own suspicions re Fitz.

Yes, it was an amazing, perfect storm of events that allowed for concealment of Fitz’s doctored wraps/loaded gloves (each way bet) which you have somehow seen through without needing to refer to facts, logic and contemporary reports.

I am duly gobsmacked.

 

I'm glad of your opinion I'd hate be to in a state of amity with you! lol

Why don't you attempt to address the replies you get that totally destroy your warped arguments?The one directly above mine is a sterling example of you being ripped to pieces without a reply from you and what passes for your tiny mind.

 

If going by birthplace, I would say Lennox Lewis is the best British Boxer ever. I don't know of any other British Boxer, who I think could have beaten him in a best of series.

 

You might well be mortified being accused of being me! lol

 

In every single person there's a Slimvey lurkin'
He could be workin' at Burger King, spittin' on your onion rings
Or in the parkin' lot circling, screamin' I don't give a ****``
With his windows down and his system up

 

Where is your evidence that this was supposed to be Fitzsimmons last fight or scheduled as such?
I don't believe you it was. Nothing you bring up to table is plausible.
You have just no valid arguments which disprove the suspion of him having cheat with plaster of paris/ hand-wrapping among others.
So I don't care to read all you stuff, as it is a waste of time and I'm finished with you.

 

There are none presented here on this place and other users have already proven years ago that it most likely happened or rather that he was a cheater.
I have not even seen a verfied source (link to this) which can make an argument against this thesis. Why you don't require this here, when you like to do it always when I share some information with the people here (like about Corbett vs. Jackson)?

 

The EVIDENCE is in the contemporary article I linked. Again, you’re welcome.

Jeeze Louise, all you gotta do is READ.

Like they say, “you can lead a horse to water but……. “. You’re suffering from acute factual dehydration. If you’re finished - GREAT - but don’t dress it up as being due to anything but the fact that you have NOTHING to back your argument.

See ya later alligator.

 

He's a Brit for me, at least.

 

it is a Strange Phenomena on Forums & Social Media!

on the one hand Research Sources are Cited, Asked for and Expected too, yet so often when this is Provided, Obliged and Sustained, it is a baffling head shaker, but there are Some that Can't & Won't Bring themselves to even acknowledge them, never mind concede to them.

Shame how they'd rather Dismiss Contemporary History for their wicked disdain or disregard for Other Posters and worse, the Truth!

Welcome to Social Media.

 

Fitzsimmons announced it both before and after the fight.
If you spent 10% of the time you do denying every bit of evidence that rips the **** out of your statements, and a further 10% of the time you claim everyone who disagrees with you is the same poster with different alts you might have actually had the time to do some research instead of interminably making an absolute show of yourself all the time!

 

I don't regard this as a valid source, for Fitzsimmons scheduled second fight labled as his goodbye/ last fight. I doubt there is any poster where something like "Time to say Goodbye" was titles, which is necessary that it was by the public viewed as his last bout.
If you find a document where the retirement was announced before the revenge match against Jeffries, then you can show me a picture of it, especially in the advertisment for the fight.
When this happened, should be more than one newspaper report it at that time, actual had to be it some dozens, like every Australian and most English speaking magazines (as The Ring).
It have to be easy to find 10 - 30 different press article about this, if anything of the story is true.

 

Nobody ever heard of this story, until this week ans you.
But you have a long history of using multiple profiles here (as you did registrate even some as back-ups years ago, as we see now), as most members here have noticed this, so it is more than likely that you still use several on this board paralell.