The best fighter in history you'd favor Wilder to beat...

He MIGHT habe beaten Morrison

 

This is probably the best answer.

Patterson was a great boxer, but big, tall punchers were his poison. And I'd favor Wilder over him by early KO, despite the huge disparity in class.

 

ken lakusta.

 

Schultz was robbed three title fights in a row. Foreman, Botha, then Moorer.

 

Thing is, its ok to windmill and put maximum power in to hay makers when your opposition is below standard. His style is tailor made for a world class well schooled heavy to take advantage of as soon as he meets one. He has KO written all over him imo.

 

Boxers , trainers , promoters etc see Wilder as a very dangerous opponent thats unpredictable , hard to read and realize that one mistake can lead to brutal stoppage loss within seconds. They take Wilder as a serious threat whereas the armchair warrior on a forum see him as the second coming of Seth Mitchel.

Bellew said he'd fight Parker ,Fury , Whyte 'without a shadow of a doubt ' and will fight David Haye twice in a row but when it came to Wilder he came straight out and said - "I am never going anywhere near that man"

There's loads of high profile names that Wilder has the potential to beat such as Rahman , Peter , Igbragmov , Valeuv , Briggs , Haye (prime) , Byrd , WK , Joshua .

 

Old Foreman would get beaten up.