Small bit of background to the ratings, Sullivan didn't achieve much with the gloves as he had the potential to do, I think he could make top 5 here if he had had the fights but he didn't. Corbett went 5 years of his peak without a fight and then lost to Fitz, Bob himself went almost ten years without been bested at Heavy. Maher I probably overate but he beat Choynsky, Slavin, Goddard, Ruhlin, at least matched Sharkey and beat a slew of contender types including blacks from 1891-1900. McVea over Wills is probably controversial but he was able to beat a near peak Harry, a peak Langford, edged Jeannette IMO and lost less often than most in his peak years. Goddard I like with the Jackson, Choynsky and Maher performances and I also think Burns underrated, IMO he is very close to McVea and Jeannette. Willard I don't see that much in his resume, his standout win in a fight that all the conditions suited him, wins over an erratic Smith and Moran and a green McCarthy plus a few embarrassing performances. I have no problem in leaving Miske out, several could take his place.
Don't get me wrong, I agree with your criticism's completely. What I disagree with is the emphasis, importance and impact those criticism's have. Since beginning my journey into boxing history i've developed and ethos of appreciation and reward for a boxer's efforts. I feel as fan's we're overly critical and set the bar too high. What is greatness? I don't know. All I know is it's entirely subjective. What I think should be defining is a boxer's regard in their era. All a boxer can strive to do is be the best in their division. Anyone achieving this is great in my book. For all his faults willard was the best hw in the world for an indetermined amount of time. I know conventionally resume is the main ranking tool but I like an emphasis on achievement. My top 11 all hit the pinnacle by my reckoning. What more can we ask of a fighter than to be the best in the world?
I would rate Wills higher than you have done. Numerous wins against Langford, McVey, Kid Norfolk, Clark, Fulton, Firpo, Smith, Meehan, Jim Johnson, Jeanette. Defended his World Coloured title claim about 25 times. Very under-rated in my opinion, also factor into account he was ducked by Dempsey. Wills is a greater fighter at Heavyweight than Jeffries, Corbett McVea and Langford in my opinion.
I know what you mean and it's a very valid view. I just don't think Jess was ever really the best in the world. Over 20 rounds I couldn't see him beat old Johnson, Wills, McVey, Langford...hell I'm not even sure he beats Fulton.
Most people would agree with you. However McVea has pretty well the same wins(swap Martin and Barry for Firpo and Fulton) but with the big difference that he beat these fighters when they were nearer their prime. Not Harry's fault, but not Sam's either. From 1904-1912 Sam only lost to Joe Jeanette whom he also beat numerous times.
Suzie do you agree to take out the guys in red as we look for 30? This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected Paolino Uzcuden Johnny Risko This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected John Henry Lewis Ernie Schaff Young Stribling This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected Melio Bettina Joey Maxim This content is protected Lou Nova Arturo Godoy Nathan Mann Al Ettore Gus Dorazio This content is protected This content is protected Abe Simon Roscoe Toles This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected Tami Mauriello Joe Baski This content is protected Lee Oma This content is protected [/QUOTE]
That's a bit misleading however as the only people of note he beat were Langford whom he lost to 4x in a row after this streak, Joe Jeanette who's record with him was 1-2-1. Although I rate his other wins such as Kubaik and Jim Johnson but, I don't think it comes near Willis' wins and again I'm sure his record against Martin was even or thereabouts. I'd probably rate Fulton as a better win than Barry as well, and considering Wills was past prime for the Firpo win he gets brownie points for that as well.
[/QUOTE] I agree that everyone in the green should be in the Top 30 definite if you're looking for other opinions.
Really Matt? Johnson toyed around with Burns like he was a small child. You really think Johnson could be that dominant to McVea and Jeanette?
[/QUOTE] Matt, I definitely like Steve Hamas on the list, and I definitely like Roland Lastarza on either the 22-52 list or the 52-71 list. let's agree to put him on the 1922-1951 list. So both Hamas and Lastarza are in. I disagree on taking Lem Franklin out. Frank went an incredible 19-0 with 17 knockouts run from 1939-1941. Some of the men he beat during this run included Eddie Blunt, Jimmy Bivins, Willie Reddish, Tony Musto, Hatchetman Sheppard, Abe Simon. He beat all of these men by knockout. Franklin was the # 2 Ring Magazine contender and many accused Joe Louis' camp of ducking Franklin. Some of the other men..Eddie Blunt. "The dark spoiler", another underrated black fighter of the late 1930s-early 1940s. We talk about the two best big men of the era as Buddy Baer and Abe Simon(both men you chose to keep on the list). Well, Eddie Blunt beat both of them. Blunt was a big man 6'1 220lb, perhaps he was one of the better big men of the era. Perhaps he doesn't make the list, but better take a 2nd look at him. Lee Savold, I'm willing to leave him off, but look at his resume. He beat Lou Nova, Joe Baksi, Gus Dorazio, Eddie Blunt, Lem Franklin, Bruce Woodcock, Johnny Whiters. Not bad. Harry Bobo was a 6'4 210lb slugger who won a portion of the duration heavyweight title during world war II. Another dangerous black fighter whose Louis camp was accused of ducking.
Don't think it's misleading at all- he shut out a 26 year old Wills who had already beaten Meehan in a 4 rounder(no mean feat) and drawn with Jeannette and Langford. Rodel, Jim Johnson, Stewart were all good wins. As for Denver Martin, he ko'd him three times and dropped a points decision-hardly breaking even? He beat Langford 4 years before Harry did it and he dominated Jeannette in their famous Paris fight before losing on stamina issues(the 49th round!) after Joe had survived using illegal smelling salts. Not dissing Harry, a great fighter but being shamefully avoided by Dempsey has added to his legend in a strange way.
Matt, I definitely like Steve Hamas on the list, and I definitely like Roland Lastarza on either the 22-52 list or the 52-71 list. let's agree to put him on the 1922-1951 list. So both Hamas and Lastarza are in. I disagree on taking Lem Franklin out. Frank went an incredible 19-0 with 17 knockouts run from 1939-1941. Some of the men he beat during this run included Eddie Blunt, Jimmy Bivins, Willie Reddish, Tony Musto, Hatchetman Sheppard, Abe Simon. He beat all of these men by knockout. Franklin was the # 2 Ring Magazine contender and many accused Joe Louis' camp of ducking Franklin. Some of the other men..Eddie Blunt. "The dark spoiler", another underrated black fighter of the late 1930s-early 1940s. We talk about the two best big men of the era as Buddy Baer and Abe Simon(both men you chose to keep on the list). Well, Eddie Blunt beat both of them. Blunt was a big man 6'1 220lb, perhaps he was one of the better big men of the era. Perhaps he doesn't make the list, but better take a 2nd look at him. Lee Savold, I'm willing to leave him off, but look at his resume. He beat Lou Nova, Joe Baksi, Gus Dorazio, Eddie Blunt, Lem Franklin, Bruce Woodcock, Johnny Whiters. Not bad. Harry Bobo was a 6'4 210lb slugger who won a portion of the duration heavyweight title during world war II. Another dangerous black fighter whose Louis camp was accused of ducking.[/QUOTE] Abe Simon was due to go soon and I think Blunt just lost too often to make it. Savold too lost a lot despite his many fine wins but I'm off to study Franklin and Bobo a bit more.
Jack dominated both of them too and Burns wins over O'Brien, Hart and Flynn were impressive. I mean Burns beat Hart easy and he at the minimum gave Johnson a tough argument.
You're right about Martin I was wrong in my recollection. I guess I'll just agree to disagree about the whole thing. McVea didn't have the consistency of Wills at a very high level.
Ha ha, a qualified agreement! PS Sam was consistent...... Anyway as I said most would agree with you.