The Best Ref Ever

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Sweet Science, Aug 30, 2007.

  1. Sweet Science

    Sweet Science Peaceful Muslim Warrior Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    8
    Somebody started a thread about the worst ref ever, it got me thinking about the topic of best ref ever. As referees very rarely get any praise.

    In my personal experience I would go for an English ref called Mickey Vann from Leeds. In all the fights I have seen him referee I observed him to be a fine no nonsense disciplinarian. I also feel he lets the fight flow when needed and at the same time is always on the ball and quick to pick up any rule infringements.

    Who is your pick?
     
  2. peter5

    peter5 Marco.A.Barrera Full Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    3,727
    Likes Received:
    3
    Mickey Vann is a good shout, for all those reasons there you stated. He never seems to get alot wrong, which is what you want, right decisions at the right time.
     
  3. Rickypr18

    Rickypr18 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2006
    Messages:
    746
    Likes Received:
    0
    Richard Steele.
     
  4. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    4,223
    Likes Received:
    1,625
    Unfortunately my two favorites are gone: Mills Lane and Mitch Halpern.

    There are some that I like here and there - Tony Orlando, Frank Cappucino, Eddie Cotton, Wayne Kelly, Steve Smoger, Fred Steinweinder, Vic Drakulich.
     
  5. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2006
    Messages:
    25,495
    Likes Received:
    2,148
    He would be my modern pick as well.
     
  6. Woller

    Woller Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    314
    Richard Steele and Arthur Mercante Sr.

    Woller
     
  7. Woller

    Woller Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    314
    And then maybe the very best: John Coyle

    Woller
     
  8. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2007
    Messages:
    11,604
    Likes Received:
    288
    I'd be curious to know why it should not be Arthur Mercante, Sr. What might he have done wrong? Where might he have screwed up? It's a process of elimination type inquiry.

    Stanley Christodoulou comes to mind. His explicit criteria for determining precisely when to stop Pryor/Arguello I was spot on.

    Mills Lane did a great job officiating Holmes/Cooney. A diminutive man with a commanding presence. A little flamboyant though. Ideally, a referee ought not to be noticed, and shouldn't be a decisive factor in turning the tide of a fight, as Tony Perez did in round two of Ali/Frazier II, or as Arthur Donovan did in Louis/Mauriello.

    Mercante's presence wasn't merely commanding enough to induce boxers to break on his verbal command, but his nonverbal communications skills actually enabled him to effectively referee matches between boxers who spoke in different languages.

    During Mercante's career, the era of referees also scoring contests went into decline. Even when stripped of this authority, he was able to maintain control of the action. (Naturally, if a referee is also judging a bout, the sensible thing is to respect his authority. This can be somewhat diminished if he's not keeping a scorecard, but it wasn't true for Mercante.)
     
  9. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2006
    Messages:
    25,495
    Likes Received:
    2,148
    Larry Hazzard was a good ref as a commissioner he rarely made much sense, but he was spot on about refs not scoring fights.

    It is potentially very dangerous, a ref's sole job should be looking after the safety of each fighter; to have to judge a fight as well, is a job too much.
     
  10. Vockerman

    Vockerman LightJunior SuperFlyweigt Full Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    908
    Likes Received:
    85
    IMHO

    Arthur Donovan
     
  11. Sweet Science

    Sweet Science Peaceful Muslim Warrior Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    8
    Very true, my pick for best ref Mickey Vann wasn't too great a judge either. He scored the Chavez/Whitaker fight a draw! and was responsible for the majority draw verdict. He actually admitted to deducting a point off Whitaker for what he said was a low blow. This despite the fact that he wasn't refereeing the fight, the actual ref did not ask the judges to deduct a point. Mickey Vann just took it upon himself to deduct a point from Whitaker on his score card. A prime example of a good referee making a bad judge.
     
  12. Napoleon

    Napoleon Smokin' Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2006
    Messages:
    2,411
    Likes Received:
    44
    Wrong thread.

    This thread is for best ref ever not worst.
     
  13. andyZOR

    andyZOR Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    17,049
    Likes Received:
    2
    Mills Lane
     
  14. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    23,663
    Likes Received:
    2,143
    Ruby Goldstein, Arthur Mercante SR, and JR. Randy Neumann,Richard Steele,Mills Layne and a couple of spanish guys I cant think of right now, Perez and?
     
  15. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2007
    Messages:
    11,604
    Likes Received:
    288
    My reservations about Hazzard as a referee concern the fact that he was too active and involved in the action. Boxing is a spectator sport, and as I've stated before, I don't think a great referee draws attention to himself. Sometimes, I noticed Hazzard to the exclusion of the competitors.Through most of boxing's history, referees did perform as judges, sometimes as the sole judge. Yet past generations of retired boxers didn't seem to be afflicted with premature dementia as much as today's younger retirees from the sport, and this despite the fact that referees doubled as judges in an era when professionals might have 200 to 400 fights (not including amateur competition).

    It's challenging for me to question a system which worked perfectly well for over a century, and I see no evidence that taking judging duties away from the referee has enhanced boxer safety.It's been my understanding that in Mexico, the ringside physician can press a button to set off a red light ending a match, and that this system has worked very well in that country. Can anybody on ESB verify that this has been the practice there?