The best super heavies. Can they be outboxed?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Mar 29, 2009.


  1. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,345
    Jun 29, 2007
    Over the years I have mentioned before that super heavyweights with skills such as Bowe, Lewis or Klitschko is the present and future of heavyweight boxing. If such a man is there, he's going to be the #1 or #2 man in his prime.

    Height and size, when combined with speed, skills, and power are tough things to overcome. If the big guy learns how to either in-fight, or clinch, he's going to be very hard to beat.

    While any heavyweight in theory can lose a fight on one big punch, or an injury one this is clear. Out boxing a super heavyweight with skills unless you are one yourself is not an option. It is best to look at the facts.

    Riddick Bowe has 45 fights. Lennox Lewis had 44 fights. W. Klitschko has 55 fights to date , and V Klitschko has 39 fights to date. Combined they have 183 fights. How many of them were decision losses? Anyone care to guess?

    The answer is just one. Bowe lost a razor thin decision to Holyfield ( A top 15 ATG for sure ) on a fight marred with a controversial 17-minute break, which may have allowed Holyfield to completely re-fuel and keep boxing and moving the way he was earlier to defeat Bowe.

    Anyone care to discuss this topic?
     
  2. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Lennox was getting ********* by Bruno, and the Mercer fight was incredibly close.

    I disregard the Klitschko's because they should be dominating the joke of a Heavyweight division. Nothing special.

    I think Bowe could be *********, and the decision loss to Holyfield was indicative of that. I also favor Ali to beat all of them on points, and he cannot really be considered a Super Heavy.
     
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,726
    Sep 14, 2005
    Well Wlad, Bowe, and Lennox sure. these 3 have some very good skills. but not vitali. I think he will be exposed soon enough once he faces a real boxer. vitalis skills arnt anywhere near the class of those 3. but I can see your point..lets see how it plays out.


    - On a side note, 35 year old ray mercer very well may have outboxed lennox lewis, this doesnt look good for lennox. I think i scored it even. Also Frank Bruno was soundily outboxing lennox on my card before that left hook landed.
     
  4. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,345
    Jun 29, 2007
    The numbers are 183 combined fights, and only 1 loss via decision. Amazing if you ask me. Regarding the Klitschko's, I don't think either has ever come close to losing on points, and I tend to doubt either will.

    Lewis and Bowe fought in a better era to be sure, but after the final bell, their hands were raised in every case except for one.
     
  5. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,345
    Jun 29, 2007
    You were making some good posts. Let us not go there. History tells us Vitali has never been behind on the score cards after three rounds, and has the best rounds won to rounds lost ratio in the history of heavyweight champions. Vitali may not be everyone's cup of tea, but he can punch, is very active, is hard to catch clean, and can counter.

    Vitali has faced a few good boxers in his career. Gomez, Donald, and Byrd come to mind. The scorecards in terms of rounds won to rounds lost were lopsided.

    If you want my opinion, I think Wlad might be more prone to a point’s defeat simply because he sometimes risks less and is more prone to knockdown 10-8 rounds.

    I had Lewis up 6-4 over Mercer.
     
  6. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Only because Golota was an idiot.
     
  7. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,345
    Jun 29, 2007
    I would argue, that the Golota who fought Bowe was Goltoa at his best, and he was a super heavy with skills. 6'4" with an 80" reach.
     
  8. FromWithin

    FromWithin Living for the city Full Member

    2,538
    0
    Feb 22, 2008
    Golota is a super heavyweight.
     
  9. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Prime Bowe was the best of the bunch IMO.
     
  10. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    It's hard to tell whether it has to do with the Klitschko bros.'/Lewis's/Bowe's talent in relation to their peers or their size, but I think it's a fair conclusion to say that (under the modern rules) a tall skilled superheavyweight is all but impossible to outbox over 12 rounds except by another tall skilled superheavyweight. By "tall skilled superheavyweight", I'm referring to boxers between 6"3 and about 6"8. Vitali seems to be about as tall as a boxer can get before height starts to seriously damage mobility and Vitali is rather unusual in that he has short arms for his height which allow him to throw short punches well.

    Now, I did add a qualifier in "under the modern rule-set". I'm a big believer in my "adaptation" approach to boxing history (first proposed during marathon debates with Revolver about his ridiculous 1960-paradigm theory) which applies the common-sense proposition that winners are those best suited to their sport to boxing history. As rules change, so the specifications of the best-suited boxers change.

    Today, a successful heavyweight needs to be strong, have a good outside game and a long jab. On the other hand, attributes useful in the past (stamina over long fights, infighting ability, the ability to fight frequentely for years on end tc.) are no longer necessary to make it in the heavyweight division.

    Lewis, Bowe and the Klitschkos all fit this model (though Bowe had a good inside game and about as good a level of stamina as a big man can have) making them the basic model for success today. Tyson and Holyfield are examples of other approaches that have had some success (Tyson: short boxers who can slip beneath taller boxers' punches; Holyfield: short boxers with mobility and skill who can out-hustle bigger me) but these kinds of boxers are no as suited to the modern game.

    Could Lewis, Bowe or the Klitschkos be outboxed in the modern epoch? It's not inconceivable, but it would take a boxer better suited than Holyfield (who gave Lewis a very good fight in their second bout) which isn't on the horizon. Boxing is a brutal game and to succeed it in it one must be suited to it. As boxing is now, I think it's plain that Vitali and Wlad are the best suited to their time and place.
     
  11. jones1

    jones1 Active Member Full Member

    834
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    Interesting statistics. I think this also has to due with the fact that heavyweights have always lacked fast in and out fighters. This is the only other option to outbox one of these guys other than having the same reach advantages that they have. Evander Holyfield was one of the exceptions of being a quick in and out fighter who used his jab and footwork to win a decision. How many other heavyweights benefit from this kind of hand and foot speed? Not many.
     
  12. COULDHAVEBEEN

    COULDHAVEBEEN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,776
    16
    Jul 10, 2007
    The numbers do speak loud.

    IMO Bowe was at least the equal of the Klitschkos.

    I do think Ali would have found a way to beat all of them though.
     
  13. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    98
    Feb 18, 2006
    Yes, but how many decisions did Tunney, Louis, and Marciano lose. Two in about 200 or so fights, and the Louis loss to Charles came when he was old.

    You are talking about domination which has always been the norm in the heavyweight division, size aside.

    And Bowe should have not been given the decision on Billy Zumbrum, who is 6' at most and would certainly not be a super-heavyweight without supplements.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,863
    47,794
    Mar 21, 2007
    Agree.
     
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,345
    Jun 29, 2007

    Bowe is 6'5" with an 80"+ reach. He is certainly a super heavy.

    Louis and Marciano lost many rounds, and sometimes had to come back to win fights down on points. The Lastarza's, Conn's, Lowry's, Pastor's and Godoy's of boxing would not out box a top super heavy with skills. I am convinced they would be in over their heads. While the group I mentioned did win plenty of rounds vs Louis and Marciano, I think defensive footwork and guard, combined with not having a great height and reach advantage had a lot to do with it. In is possible / probable that Louis and Marciano received gift decisions.

    Tunney only lost one official decisions, but he was rather unique for his time.

    I have few conclusions on super heavies:

    1 ) Height is an advantage on the outside as the shorter man losses range as his punches upward. The maximum striking distance is a straight line from the shoulder. The more a fighter has to raise his arc, the less range he has.

    2 ) Reach or as I prefer to call it striking distance from the put of the arm to the glove is an advantage super heavies usually have.

    3 ) The jab is the key punch for outfighting. Super heavies have a huge advantage here, as it not only can pile up points, but also in the case of a skilled super heavyweight offers a set up for the right hand, or the left hook. The smaller man must somehow get past the super heavyweight jab, avoid being tied up, get into range and land, and then land his blows. After he attacks, he has to watch out for a counter if he misses.

    4 ) Old time large heavyweights were not as good of boxers, and often lacked good jabs, and skilled hooks or right hands behind it, in addition to having a pour defense. They also had slower hand speed. The historians who suggest that Willard or Carnera were beatable big guys, then say the same for modern super heavies without no qualifies are off base in my opinion.