The best super heavies. Can they be outboxed?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Mar 29, 2009.


  1. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    Holyfield often struggled vs bigger / skilled fighters. On a fair score card he is 1-4 vs Lewis and Bowe. I do think you have a point. Holy was a quick and skilled guy with good mobility, speed, and most importantly good counter punching and body shots.

    Holyfield also had an excellent chin, which is needed when your giving up a lot on the outside. Still, as I said his performances vs Bowe and Lewis suggest that even one who was well equipped to overcome, in most cases did not.
     
  2. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,564
    Dec 18, 2004
    Bowe was outboxed and outthought by Tubbs, but I do agree with the essence of the thread.
     
  3. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    And, as anticipated, most of the discussion between supposed historians in this thread has assumed that there's this static unchanging sport called "boxing". :verysad
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,822
    29,267
    Jun 2, 2006
    ' The brothers GRIM are clearly the best big men but their opposition has been woeful imo.Ali outboxes them both imo.and Lewis who would not be mobile enough to keep up with Ali .Bowe was too easy to hit to beat Ali
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,664
    27,380
    Feb 15, 2006
    Can they be outboxed by a smaller heavyweight?

    The answer to that is yes, but it is probably going to take an exceptional fighter to do it eg Holyfield over Bowe.
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    I do not want to start an Ali vs thread. For whatever reason some historians are gun shy about saying honest observations that are viewed as degratory on Ali's flaws.

    Ali really had trouble with good jabbers at every stage of his career.

    D Jones. Ali won 6-4 on my card; this fight took place less than a year before Ali defeated Liston for the title.

    K Norton 1973. Ali lost a clean decision before he beats Frazier or Foreman.

    K Norton 1973. Re-match, and the only one of the three where Ali can honestly be called winner.

    Lyle 1975. Lyle was up on points because his jab was better prior to the stoppage. Ali was 33 years old here.

    Young 1976. Who really won is debatable. Ali was likely in his decline by this time; however, he did say Jimmy reminded him what he was like when he was Younger. Again, Young's jab gave Ali fits.

    Norton 1976. Norton won the fight 10 rounds to 5 but was robbed!

    We can skip the Holmes fight because Ali was too old, but I think above names represent the best out fighters Ali fought. Men with skills, and a jab.

    My point? I think Bowe, Lewis and both Klitschkos are better boxers and jabbers, and hit harder than anyone on this list. So you betcha boots they could beat Ali, just like Norton did, or like Young, Lyle, or Jones nearly did...by out boxing him.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,822
    29,267
    Jun 2, 2006
    If you think the Klits are better boxers than Ali we have nowhere to go with this discussion.
     
  8. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    McVey, I think the last sentence here sums it up best.
    Do you really think Norton, Young or Lyle were harder to out box than Lewis, Bowe or the Klitschko's I do not.
     
  9. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    98
    Feb 18, 2006
    1. "Bowe is 6' 5" and a super-heavyweight"-----So. My sentence refers to Zumbrum as being 6' and built up on steroids. I don't see what point you are making. No one disputes that Bowe is a super-heavyweight.

    2. What you say about height is true but it always has been not only at heavyweight but all the other weights. How did a 5' 6" Basilio defeat Robinson who certainly was skilled and had a good jab? How did Al Brown and Sandy Saddler lose to men much shorter? An aging Emile Griffith, his best years a memory, gave the 6' Carlos Monzon a close fight? How did people like Tiger and Fullmer succeed against men much taller? How did Greb defeat the much taller Tunney? How did Walker hold the much taller Sharkey to a draw? How did the 5' 11" Frazier defeat the 6' 4" Bugner, or the 6' 3" Ali, both of whom were certainly skilled. Ernie Terrell was actually taller than Wlad Klitschko, but he lost plenty of rounds to short men. What is the difference? I think two:

    A. Modern heavyweight boxers are not taught and are not very good at fighting on the inside. Pro boxing has basically become amateur boxing, sparring matches at a distance. This favors height, no doubt. If this trend toward sissy boxing continues, boxing will die, at least in the United States. Vitali versus Gomez should have been a fairly good matchup but was sided into an obscure cable channel, and justifiably. Gomez turned out to be bloated, slow, a one handed fighter with no jab or ability or willingness to fight on the inside. The fight was boringly one-sided. The contenders I have seen challenging the Klitschko's recently, Austin, Thompson, Peter, and Gomez, are depressingly limited fighters.

    B. The major contributing factor here is referees who simply do not allow inside fighting and yell 'break' the instant the shorter man closes. My attitude is that only the tall gawky "basketball" type young men should even consider boxing. Why compete in a sport in which the tall man's advantages--height and reach--are allowed, but the short man's advantages--a lower center of gravity, short arms which allow one to work the body inside--are foreclosed by the referees for reasons not clear to me. Body punches hurt but they probably do not create the long-term damage head punches do. I would think boxing officials would encourage body work.
     
  10. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,740
    Sep 14, 2005
    Mendoza,

    Ali was way past his prime against norton lyle and young. Ali weighed wut 230lb of fat when he fought young? talk about overweight. the 1964-1967 ali was a much faster sharper boxer than the one of the mid 1970s
     
  11. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,251
    13,282
    Jan 4, 2008
    I just don't know where you got the idea from that Jones and Lyle outjabbed Ali. There's just no merit to that. Norton gave Ali trouble with his jab and Young to some extent (but it was more the counter right), though.
     
  12. META5

    META5 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,538
    2,468
    Jun 28, 2005
    Don't try to use facts when discussing Ali with Mendoza ... it just doesn't suit the agenda. Again we hear that Ali had trouble with jabbers at all stages of his career, yet, no mention of Ali taking Liston's jab completely out of the equation, as well as the jab of Terrell.

    Nah, all you needed to do to trouble Ali was throw a good jab, just like all it took to trouble Holmes was an overhand right, Tyson if you stood up to him, Louis if you used your feet, Lewis if you cracked the chin, Dempsey if you were Black, Duran if you stayed on the outside and so on and so forth.
     
  13. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,251
    13,282
    Jan 4, 2008
    Well put.
     
  14. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    Well Liston quit in the first fight and likely took a dive / or opted not to get up in the second fight. I had Ali up 3 rounds to 2 before Liston opted not to come out in their first meeting. Liston injury remained a mystery and he never had any corrective surgery to my knowledge.

    I suggest you watch Ali vs Lyle. Lyle was in fact out boxing him for the first 8 rounds or so and most certainly had a lead prior to Ali landing one of the best right crosses of his career. The stoppage was a tad quick if you ask me. I would have given Lyle a few more seconds, and his corner was going berserk.

    If you want to debate scorecards on Ali vs Jones, Norton, Lyle or Young, please start a separate thread. We will quickly see who is calling it as it was and who has an agenda. Until then I’d like to keep the focus of this thread on the topic I started. Fair enough?
     
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    I would not say Ali was way past his prime vs Norton. Ali was 31 years old in this fight, and looked good after coming off his first career loss to Frazier in 1971. Norton was just a hard match up for Ali.

    Ali was 33 for Lyle. Not exactly old. Maybe slightly past his prime is the best way to put it. After facing Lyle, Ali put on perhaps his best performance of the 1970's vs Joe Frazier in 1976. So there is not way Ali was way past his prime here in my opinion in the Lyle fight.

    Ali slowed down a bit more around 1976. The 3rd Frazier fight took a lot out of Ali. After this fight Ali was 34, and seemed to lack the stamina and work ethic to get into top form. In the Young fight and his 3rd fight with Norton Ali struggled big time vs skilled boxers.

    Now allow me to build a build a bridge to the topic at hand. It is my observation that Super Heavies with skills had perhaps the best style for an aging 34+ year old fighter. Lewis and V. Klitshcko are two of the best 35+ year old heavies I ever saw. In fact if there were such a thing as best all times heavies over 35, Lewis and V. Klitschko would be in my top 5. Why is a good question. I think height, power a good reach, and a jab allow them to dictate the pace of their action, and even though they are older the smaller younger fighters still have a lot to cope with to score.