The best technique between Louis, Lewis, Wlad and Vitaly?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, May 10, 2017.


Who had the best technique?

  1. Louis

    27 vote(s)
    81.8%
  2. Lewis

    2 vote(s)
    6.1%
  3. Vitaly

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Wlad

    4 vote(s)
    12.1%
  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,101
    Jun 2, 2006
    Get out of jail power is a terrific equalizer.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,101
    Jun 2, 2006
    There must be a lot of "alts" voting!lol
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,101
    Jun 2, 2006
    There must be a lot of "alts" voting!lol
    No, he would have been an hermaphrodite.
     
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    I don't really follow you. I'd actually favor the Klits and Lewis against Louis because of their size, but I think Louis is the superior technician by some distance.
     
  5. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017

    The problem is I don't buy your misdirects and hold you to what you actually say. So let's get to it...

    Actually you have not emphasized that several times. You've made several contradicting statements here, even the more positive ones being very backhanded.

    "He was 3-2 against top 5 fighters in the 70's. (Foreman) was outboxed by the two most technical he fought. I don't find that very effective."-you

    "3-2 against top 5 fighters where of one was life and death isn't really that effective."-you

    "I'd agree that (Foreman) was effective relative to his technical skill, though."-you

    "Compared to textbook breakers like Ali and RJJ, Foreman was only moderately effective, though. "-you


    I disagree. His ability to neutralize his opponent's pressure separates him from the countless other big men that can punch.

    No, once more that is you putting words into my mouth. My actual quote:

    "I don't believe I would label Foreman as a technically skilled fighter in the sense of what is commonly associated with that label."

    Nowhere does this state that I agree with your conflicting observations and nor did I say anything about technical skill in regards to "his level."
     
  6. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    The poll is a selection bias. "Wlad, Lewis, and Vitali" are all three super heavyweights concentrated in the same era perhaps unfairly but none the less not renowned for overall technical ability.
     
  7. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    I see nothing contradictory here. His prime record was good, but not close to that of Ali and RJJ. But he still did better than someone with less size, power and strength but equal technical skill would do. Hence "effective relative to his technical skill" and "only moderately effective" compared to RJJ and Ali.

    I think that is something I can agree with actually. It is a bit hard to say since he met so few top class fighters in his prime and lost to two of them, but I've always been impressed with his ability to cut off the ring and use his physicality. It is of course dependent on that named physicality, but I do think he was good at getting the most out of his abilities. But as I said, it is complicated to say something for certain here, since we don't have that many fights against top opposition to judge him by.

    Ok. I got my hopes up too early then. :)
     
  8. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    Of course you wouldn't.

    Who's arguing that?

    Or you could have just agreed with my original statement that he was effective. Compared to Ali, every heavyweight with the exception of possibly Louis is going to come up very short in terms of resume.


    Ali (L)
    Young (L)
    Frazier x2
    Norton
    Lyle
    Kirkman
    Chuvalo
    Peralta
    LeDoux
    Roman
    Dino Denis
    Wepner


    Is enough to judge him among his peers. Is enough to judge him and earn him a legacy. Among his early 70s peers, he easily has the best resume behind Ali himself.
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2017
  9. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    No, it's not easily better than Frazier's. Not better at all actually:

    Ali (L x 2)
    Foreman (L x 2)
    Ali
    Ellis x 2
    Quarry x 2
    Bugner
    Bonavena x 2
    Chuvalo
    Mathis
    Ramos
    Machen
    Doug Jones
    Bob Foster
    Daniels
    Stander
     
  10. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    no, i thought you said Primo had no defence with his hands down all the time.


    I havent gone anywhere, someone else coined the name cowardzaghe and its stuck. there is nothing I have done.
     
  11. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    Foreman will usually rate higher than Frazier but overall, arguable, most resumes are. Personally, I was thinking more of the specific time period when the two were active together as actual "peers". I can't agree with this statement:

    "since we don't have that many fights against top opposition to judge him by."

    We aren't talking about Ike Ibeabuchi here. We are talking a guy who did in fact mix up with the best regarded heavies of his era in Ali, Frazier, Lyle, Young, and Norton.

    Quarry is the only missing piece in the puzzle, but I don't think you need him to properly evaluate Foreman. He beat three men that are combined 4-0 (4 KOs) against Quarry.
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2017
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    Not at all sure that most rate Foreman higher. If they do it's probably on the strength of his comeback. Without I definitely think most would rank Joe higher,

    I actually am a bit unsure just what to make of his fights post Ali. I think he might have been damaged good mentally by then and therefore we perhaps shouldn't make too much of the relatively unconvincing performances after Zaire. More fights against top opposition before that (say Ellis and Quarry) would probably have given us a better clue as to which is which: If Frazier and Norton primarily were good stylistical match-ups for him and his subsequent fights a better indication of his quality, or if he wasn't the same after Zaire and the fights before Zaire a better indication of how good he really was?
     
  13. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,690
    9,879
    Jun 9, 2010
    I luv'em both but, in a properly considered rating, I think Frazier is just above Foreman, despite Big George's 90s comeback. Frazier has a better resume, in my opinion - apart from Ali, his Ellis, Quarry, Machen, Bonavena and Chuvalo wins are solid.

    I also think, in the spirit of this thread, that Frazier was more the exemplar of technique, within the style he practiced. Not perfect all-round but, in certain areas, perhaps better than anyone. Foreman was not utterly bereft of skills but he's a slugger and sluggers are about brute force and raw power; no display of finesse required.
     
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    The one clear technical flaw I can think of with Frazier is that he had few memorable combos and landed few memorable punches except the left hood. The right was at times an effective set-up punch, but not that much more. Otherwise he was quite technically I'd say. Showed against Foreman in the rematch that he even could box well. His lack of height and reach meant that he couldn't outbox George, but he looked pretty good.
     
  15. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,690
    9,879
    Jun 9, 2010
    I'd have to agree, regarding a lack of Frazier combos. But his left hook is the stuff of legend.

    The right was, as you suggest, more of a set-up punch; almost a rhythm/tempo punch. Although, when he threw it to the body, it looked quite punishing.

    I just loved the way he could come forward; pressure his opponents; make his opponents miss; create openings and punish them with essentially one hand. His upper-body movement was a nightmare; even for sharpshooters.

    His style gave him a short shelf-life, in my opinion. By the time he faced Big George for the second time, he had no real offensive snap left in him. But, as you imply, even for a Heavy who was small in stature, he looked quite good in attempting to outbox Foreman - while it lasted.
     
    Bokaj likes this.