The "Bible of Boxing" Loses its Credibility

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Thread Stealer, Sep 12, 2007.


Page 4 of 4
  1. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    You're just looking at it with Oscar-colored glasses, and remember all the negative things I say about him.

    What do you expect in this situation? Me to praise GBP?
     
    Thread Stealer, Sep 12, 2007
    Thread Stealer, Sep 12, 2007
    #46
  2. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Have i praised him????

    I havent said it's a good or bad thing.

    I just know that we have yet to see the results whether negative or positive.You on the other hand have already made up your mind regardless.
     
    PolishPummler, Sep 12, 2007
    PolishPummler, Sep 12, 2007
    #47
  3. The Whaler

    The Whaler My dog be thorough. Full Member

    1,265
    3
    Aug 3, 2006
    I don't think GBP will be able to dramatically change the Ring magazine to favor GBP fighters because of the amount of scrutiny the magazine will receive now. If we start seeing GBP fighters rush to the top of the rankings, and see a gluttony of articles focused only on GBP fighters then people will call B.S. and the Ring will have then completely lost all of its credibility.

    I think it's a little too early to say this is a bad or a good thing, but it's definetely crippled Ring magazine's image.
     
    The Whaler, Sep 12, 2007
    The Whaler, Sep 12, 2007
    #48
Page 4 of 4