OK, so I was in my local ASDA in Toryglen in Glasgow the other day & I went to the magazine section to have my usual look through Boxing news. So I seen the Frank Bruno interview, & the journo said Bruno was acting all billy bigtime, telling the interviewer that he wouldnt discuss anything about him taking drugs, & he only posed for one photo, & big Frank didnt look at all happy in the one photo he did pose for! I was in a hurry though, & couldnt hang around to read the whole interview right through, so Im just wondering if anyone else here read the aforementioned interview, & was it interesting? i.e was Frank in full blown arsehole mode? he seemed to be at the start of the piece, & I was just wondering what people who read the interview made of it, & made of him. Over to you, thats if anyone has read it that is!
I am a boxing news subscriber and really like the magazine. I would recomend it to anyone and the large interviews are usually very good, the previous weeks Freddie Roach piece was brilliant and one of the best boxing reads I have seen in quite some time but the Bruno one was a disgrace and very amaturish. The writer is very over rated at the publication and usually serves up below par fight reviews and segments. He is called Danny Flexen, a name to avoid if you can. Flexen seemed to have an agenda that Bruno sussed from the begining. We know Bruno is still not a well man but the interview was very poor and the finished article mildly embarrassing for all unvolved.
yeah they were good. went into a bit of detail on the **** case as well. always thought he did it tbh. :yep shame i chucked em now. :-(