The biggest beating in the history of the hw division (my opinion))

Are we going by longevity of the beating, or just how badly they were massacred?

 

In that case, I will have to go with Razor Ruddock knocking out Michael Dokes (RIP). When I saw this punch land, I thought it was an early demise for Dokes for sure.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uehFuWEkI-Q

 

The quick massacres are better for the loser.

Frazier probably took less damage in those two rounds against Foreman than Briggs did against Vitali.

Briggs got ****ed up, and he made the full 12 rounds.

I don't think i've ever felt more sorry watching someone get their ass kicked than watching that fight.

 

Jimmy young vs. George foreman

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

Meehan vs Dempsey, the first fight. Embarrassing and brutal Newpaper Dec

 

I have watched the full rounds of Baer v carnera and can honestly say it was NOT a massacre. Highlights give the impression Carnera was slaughtered all the way through but the truth was Primo had 4 bad rounds and the rest were competative. Carnera would outbox Baer for long spells after max blew himself out trying to end things. I will watch to make sure but off the top of my head primo was down in rounds one, two and three but got back into the fight and there were no knockdowns in either 4,5,6,7,8 or 9. Primo won half of those rounds too. Sure he got pounded but there are more one sided fights than that. Ali-Holmes was worse. Lewis-Tyson was more one sided as well. Many fights were.

 

I think that many of the kd's suffered by Carnera were from subpar Baer shots. I think that Max never really had to tee off on Primo..like he did vs Schaff and Carnera.he would have killed Da Preem if he did.

 

Frazier v Ellis was more of a massacre than Baer v Carnera.

If Carnera won 4 rounds or so it is nota massacre. It was not a whitewash. 6 rounds of 11 were competative.