the black murderers row today.....

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by shommel, Mar 25, 2009.


  1. shommel

    shommel Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,118
    11
    Jun 12, 2008
    how would these guys fare today? guys like williams. lytel ,burley,satterfield and the rest of them? is any of them champion?
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,955
    45,847
    Mar 21, 2007
    There would be many belt-holders at many weights amongst their number.

    Depending on circumstances, a guy like Burley or Williams would be p4p #1.
     
  3. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    Well you always can fancy Satterfield to ko someone or be koed by a top quality opponent, so he might get a title. Bert Lytell and Charley Burley you could probably take to the bank to bag a title. And Williams, well you look at the boxing masterclass Hopkins put on against Pavlik, now to me Hopkins is better than Williams, and that fight also wasnt at 160, but its nitpicking to me all that. Williams is a decent bet, who knows.
     
  4. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    34,307
    17,098
    Jul 29, 2004
    160-175 isnt very strong really.

    I would imagine most of those guys would at least hold a title...and I reckon they would be dominating whatever divisions they chose to compete at.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    They'd all be on top of boxing.

    Burley would be WW champ, which he'd exchange a few times with Holman Williams but win the series. Charles would be a 3 weight dominant champ from 160-175 and maybe goto Cruser-HW for belts. Moore would pick up Charles left overs but Hopkins may get a win over Moore. Bivins/Marshall would be temporary champions and would have losses to murderers row fighters and BHOPs/Dawson may beat them.

    The only threat to them would be Mosley at 147, but Mosley loses, 160-168 there are no major threats to them, and Hopkins/Dawson at 175 but Hopkins is too old to beat prime Murderers Row fighters and Dawson we don't know yet.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,955
    45,847
    Mar 21, 2007
    Burley would probably turn pro at 140, though I don't know how long he could hold it.

    Domination at 147 would follow.

    154 would be his best division and would be the one he would find himslef annointed as p4p #1.

    160 would be where he would really start to attract admiration.

    If the right fights could be made at 168, he would visit it.
     
  7. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    34,307
    17,098
    Jul 29, 2004
    Who are we considering the murderers row here though?

    I thought it consisted of these guys

    Charley Burley
    Eddie Booker
    Bert Lytell
    Jack Chase
    Holman Williams
    Lloyd Marshall

    Maybe that includes Bivins and Wade.

    But I didnt think Charles and Moore were lumped in with them..as really they had a lot of success and opportunity compared to those blokes.
     
  8. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    52
    Oct 15, 2007
    Yeah well Moore gets included due to him not getting the chance for so long, he ended up getting his title shot, but for years he was in the boat of the others.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,955
    45,847
    Mar 21, 2007
    Eddie Booker...i mean there's no footage, but i'd happily put all i got on him shutting out undisputed world champion Kelly Pavlik something like 12-0.
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    Charles had to beat them all to get those opportunities and Moore had to have to keep winning for 2decades to get those opportunities
     
  11. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,774
    300
    Dec 12, 2005
    These were the members of the "Black Murderers' Row" as devised by Budd Schulberg (who wrote "On the Waterfront":

    Charley Burley
    Eddie Booker
    Aaron Wade
    Bert Lytell
    Lloyd Marshall
    Jack Chase
     
  12. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    345
    Jul 13, 2007
    Burley v. Calzaghe???? Hmmmm:think
     
  13. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,774
    300
    Dec 12, 2005
    Burley was murder to fight. I'd pick him over Calzaghe.
     
  14. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    345
    Jul 13, 2007
    I think both are murder to fight...Calzaghe stylistically, and Burley, because he'd knock the hell out of you.
     
  15. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,774
    300
    Dec 12, 2005
    Both presented unorthodox stylistic dilemmas, however, Burley had serious power that Calzaghe just didn't have. Calzaghe can be solved ...but Burley was not only complicated, he was very dangerous. It's tougher to solve a complicated style when you have to be so wary. Burley was one of those ring rarities who could put his whole body into his shots -maximum propulsion and leverage without losing balance. That is serious stuff.