The bottom line is simple!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Apr 19, 2008.


  1. Jnes

    Jnes Member Full Member

    417
    5
    Oct 4, 2004
    The challenge stands ye pithy pornographer!

    :smoke

    (Pithy perhaps not, I like how it sounds:smoke)
     
  2. jecxbox

    jecxbox St. Brett Full Member

    7,608
    3
    Aug 5, 2007

    :good
     
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,371
    15,341
    Jul 19, 2004
    :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
     
  4. jupzrooni

    jupzrooni Tyler Durden Full Member

    3,034
    2
    Nov 17, 2007
    :good
    good post.
     
  5. jupzrooni

    jupzrooni Tyler Durden Full Member

    3,034
    2
    Nov 17, 2007
    you're correct. hopkins had trouble during the later rounds because cal was starting to hit him with crisper and harder punches which made him back off into the corner and it became harder for him to use his dirty tactics (clinching) against cal when the fight progressed
     
  6. kungfu

    kungfu Member Full Member

    247
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    Good analysis imo, calzaghe dropped his workrate about round 4 to not get countered as much as he was early on, and it was huge factor in the fight, he adapted more than b-hop did plain and simple.... hopkins looked brilliant in bursts now and again but it wasnt enough, b-hop threw more than usual yeah which i think was reflected in the fact that he had to fake a low blow for 4 mins rest late in the fight which was pathetic imo.
     
  7. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,371
    15,341
    Jul 19, 2004
    To me, this tells the entire story.

    :smoke
     
  8. rusticraver

    rusticraver Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,563
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Bottom line is Nard was LHW champ and now he aint
     
  9. mattress

    mattress Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,030
    2
    Apr 8, 2007
    Yes, hats off to you Rumsfeld.
     
  10. marting

    marting Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,616
    2,246
    Jul 20, 2004
    To me the big factor in this fight was that Hopkins doesn't have the stamina he once had and as the fight progressed he visibly tired from having to deal with Calzaghe's relentless pressure. A younger Hopkins would have spun Calzaghe around and reversed attacks. He also would have attacked at least on a few occassions.

    Don't get me wrong though. Hopkins is a marvel at 43 years old but his legs and reflexes aren't the same.

    What we saw was the Hopkins that evolved over the last several years. A guy who struggles with quicker hands much as he did with Taylor. A Hopkins that is perfect for the likes of a low output Tarver.
     
  11. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    I think Joe could't adaopt to Hopkins fight plan, and Brnard did exactly what he said he woud do= make Joe fight his fight, but after the thid rd, it seemed hat Joe caught on and performed better, but stil seemed to be more watchfull of Nards' straight right
     
  12. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,371
    15,341
    Jul 19, 2004
    He also sacrificed volume and began throwing snappier shots. Quality adjustment.
     
  13. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    Yup, an he did take a couple of more straight rights, but shook them off very well
     
  14. Conan

    Conan I AM THE DOCTOR Full Member

    1,422
    3
    Jun 25, 2007
    You guys keep talking about how Hopkins didn't land his right hand enough. What about all the times he missed. After about the 6th, he was missing them quite a bit.
     
  15. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    That is correct, Joe looked frustrated and not sure how to handle Nards' style, even the announcers were sayin, especially Steward, that Calzaghe was getting looser as the middle rounds came on