Very true and some of them were bordline low, same as Garcia he kept hitting Khan very low.. dirty to be fair Canelo ones were ok and they slowed Khan down and hurt him..
Khan won the first two rounds. Decisively. Therefore, any judge who had it 4-1, to use a cliche, didn't know sh-- about boxing. I scored round 3 for Khan as well. You could have scored it for Canelo without looking overly foolish. Tide turned in rd 4. Canelo took it. Rd 5 was another Canelo rd. And of course, even if he hadn't been KO'd, Khan was losing the sixth. 3-2 Khan at time of stoppage.
Canelo has been the recipient of a lot of preferential treatment and biased pro ginger judging. You literally have to beat him like a red-headed stepchild to get the decision when you fight him. :yep
So far no one has been able to do that. :deal Everyone that has tried to hurt Canelo has been KO or badly hurt. :deal
4-1 scores for Kahn are extremely biased and anyone who had those scores were simply watching the fight through ginger-hate tinted glasses.
I personally had it 3-2 Alvarez at the time of the KO but rd 3 was 50/50 so 3-2 Khan is reasonable. Khan's speed looked OK early lots if movement and flashy flurries but he missed alot Alvarez seemed more accurate, Sual's misses were wide so its easy to point out Amir's were close so its easier to gloss over. Khan took rds 1/2 off activity to me rds 3 I thought Alvarez landed the better shots, but was a close rd, rds 4,5,& 6 Canelo was outboxing him and closed the show in s good outing by both.
3-2 either way are probably the most objective scores. As I stated earlier, scores were moot. It was clear from around 3rd 3 that Canelo was taking over and it was just a matter of time. And once again, this is why I love KO's and boxers who dish them out.