The change boxing needs: fights must be scored in slo-mo

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Godlovkin, Oct 6, 2015.


Page 1 of 5
  1. Godlovkin

    Godlovkin Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,656
    3
    Feb 5, 2015
    Here's what I propose for preventing further robberies

    no more hometown decissions

    no more fighters getting the W for landing punches on gloves

    or by landing uneffective love taps that count as effective punches, because of bribed / biased judges and / or venue

    Everytime a fight goes to the scorecards it'll be scored in slo-mo

    ofc, this will take some time, because judges will have to carefully examine and count every punch that was thrown in the fight, and whether or not it landed and how cleanly it did. They'll have to work on this for a few hours after the match ended, and then upload an official edited video of the match , clearly depicting the punches that were taken into account with a counter. compubox stats wont be needed anymore. It'll also be very helpful to determine intentional fouls and correct point deductions

    Ofc, the winner of the match won't be announced until the following day, in a post fight press conference

    This might appear a little anti climatic at first, but it'll be better for the sport in the long run. Fighters will try to press more for the KO, and corrupt ****s with big pockets won't feel so secure if they go to the scorecards anymore

    Do you agree with this idea?:bbbif not, you're probably a fan of Danny Gift, Mayweather and the like

    Naturally, this system would only apply for high profile matches when a belt is at stake and the like. no need to waste so much time and resources in bum matches
     
    Godlovkin, Oct 6, 2015
    Godlovkin, Oct 6, 2015
    #1
  2. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,179
    Jun 23, 2005
    One of the dumbest things I've ever heard. Please log off now.
     
    Pimp C, Oct 6, 2015
    Pimp C, Oct 6, 2015
    #2
  3. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,707
    9,926
    Jan 27, 2014
    You still have subjective scoring whether in real time or slow-motion since human judges will still be relied on to do the scoring. Controversial decisions have always been a part of boxing and won't change with slow-motion scoring.
     
    cslb, Oct 6, 2015
    cslb, Oct 6, 2015
    #3
  4. Godlovkin

    Godlovkin Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,656
    3
    Feb 5, 2015
    This content is protected


    why im not surprised you're against this

    this could work very well if it's done for high profile matches only, and it'd put an end to the corruption guys like tagweather and Garcia benefit from.
     
    Godlovkin, Oct 6, 2015
    Godlovkin, Oct 6, 2015
    #4
  5. dan4579

    dan4579 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,269
    420
    Apr 11, 2011
    You lose all sense of punching power in slo mo. Ringside is the best place to judge a fight so you can tell who's hitting harder also. Under you crazy idea, not only would the fans leave the arena not knowing who won the fight, but the sport would turn into a bunch of rediculous light fisted shoe shining on each other.
    Sorry, just not a good idea at all.
     
    dan4579, Oct 6, 2015
    dan4579, Oct 6, 2015
    #5
  6. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,179
    Jun 23, 2005
    You don't know **** about boxing troll. I will embarrass you in any debate about the sport:deal. Slow mo judging why? Because you're mad about the outcome of a few fights so lets change the whole way the sport judges fights??? It's plain ridiculous, results later that day??:lol::lol: I mean you can't make this kind of stuff up, log off.
     
    Pimp C, Oct 6, 2015
    Pimp C, Oct 6, 2015
    #6
  7. Leoh

    Leoh Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,749
    1,239
    Dec 19, 2014
    Won't work. Corruption is what needs to be addressed. Right now you can easily predict the winner of a fight if it goes to cards simply by finding out which fighter is signed with Haymon. There's no doping control. Most referees do nothing but breaking up clinches and counting to ten. These are the things that need to be fixed. Scoring is just a fun part of boxing as long as the judges are fair. A little controversy on close fights every now and then won't hurt .
     
    Leoh, Oct 6, 2015
    Leoh, Oct 6, 2015
    #7
  8. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,179
    Jun 23, 2005
    I guess guys that are signed to GBP or Top Rank never get a decision that they don't deserve either right?:roll: I also wasn't aware that every fighter once they're signed to Haymon has never lost a decision.
     
    Pimp C, Oct 6, 2015
    Pimp C, Oct 6, 2015
    #8
  9. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    :deal x 100
     
    Cisco Route, Oct 6, 2015
    Cisco Route, Oct 6, 2015
    #9
  10. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    I see the PacIdiot butthurt persists.

    Lol...
     
    Cisco Route, Oct 6, 2015
    Cisco Route, Oct 6, 2015
    #10
  11. Palooka

    Palooka Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,343
    42
    Feb 1, 2015
    I'm with Pimp C on this one. Bad idea, OP.
     
    Palooka, Oct 6, 2015
    Palooka, Oct 6, 2015
    #11
  12. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    In over 100 years of boxing tradition, *nobody* has ever had any thought of judging a prize fight in slow motion until you PacIdiots had the whole of your world destroyed on May 2 2015. Your hero LOST. Get over it already...
     
    Cisco Route, Oct 6, 2015
    Cisco Route, Oct 6, 2015
    #12
  13. NUCLEAR

    NUCLEAR Active Member Full Member

    823
    5
    Aug 20, 2015
    Nah.. PED test must be administered strictly. And fighters who are caught must be punished severely. thats why fraud mayweather can continue to juice up because of corruption.
     
    NUCLEAR, Oct 6, 2015
    NUCLEAR, Oct 6, 2015
    #13
  14. Palooka

    Palooka Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,343
    42
    Feb 1, 2015
    [yt]xlA9bNk3b5Q[/yt]
     
    Palooka, Oct 6, 2015
    Palooka, Oct 6, 2015
    #14
  15. DonnieB

    DonnieB Member Full Member

    370
    0
    Aug 23, 2011
    This is absurd
     
    DonnieB, Oct 6, 2015
    DonnieB, Oct 6, 2015
    #15
Page 1 of 5