The Charlo Bros and Spence are just Physical Beasts

a lot more than facing an Argentinian who is old, injured, and was never worth a damn. he has unfinished business with korobov as far as i am concerned. he won't be fighting golovkin, canelo, jacobs,or andrade this year, so rematch korobov or face someone like lemieux, sulecki, n'dam, horn.

 

Both Charlos got a BS W over Trout. They are nothing special, not even athletically.

 

The Charlos will give a good fight to anyone, but neither is good enough to beat the best.
Jermall just got another gift decision over someone he should have KO'd. No one is underestimating him, his limitations have been exposed.

 

Jermell was never that strong really

 

For what time? When he steps up again and takes a legitimate L?
I have given both Charlos credit when credit is due.
Jermall did a spectacular job with Bundrage, Williams and Centeno.
Jermell has a pretty damn solid resume with wins over Vanes, Rosado, Lubin, Jackson and Hatley.

But they are clearly limited as Trout exposed. And Jermell legit lost to Harrison.

So I don't even get wtf you are talking about. Give credit for some what ifs? I would be excited to see Jermall mix it up with the best at 160, but he will come up short. He is a damn fine boxer but far from the elite.

 

You do realize that you are the one bringing up the excuses?

You are literally crying over nothing here. Demanding we should give respect to what if scenarios. If Jermall/Jermell gets a signature win, there will be doubters and there will be a vocal group who will hype the **** out of the W.
It's boxing 101.

 

Why the **** are you talking about excuses?
But no, I would not make any excuses. I have already given plenty of credit to both brothers. Credit for fights others dismiss.

 

Spence is a beast. The Charlo's have fizzled.

 

Korobov disagrees.