I think you underestimate Spence's skills, he's a good deal more skilled than either Charlo if you ask me. Even with only ordinary physical abilities he would still be a top 5-10 welterweight IMHO. I think he will beat Garcia fairly comfortably, like 9-3 on points if Garcia manages to go 12 or a late TKO.
if he beats someone top notch (not gets a bs decision like over korobov) i'll gladly give him credit.
not support i just think canelo won a close fight i do not call that no robbery i had ggg winning the first and canelo the second. but hey thats just my take
This is hilarious. Hey dancing boy, you n I had this EXACT same discussion before. You’re using the most turned around inside out logic I’ve ever heard here.
N what happened to you over in your other moronic thread? You had just brought up charlo after getting all emotional n sensitive cuz I called you out for being dumb as a stump.
Called me out on it on what ? The fact that I'm saying you'll use every excuse in the book in a theoretical win ? It's just a simple question. Will you give credit yes or no and what excuse would you use. It's that simple
its easy man if GGG beat Charlo i would admit i was wrong like a man. i would own up to it. But im talking about you. you that you would favor ggg in that fight. If charlo were to beat ggg would you give credit yes or no its a simple question would you man up about it? its so easy to just answer to
I quoted you but I was talking to the guy you were arguing with. I was saying the exact things u were saying to him. He was all worked up over a non issue. Cuz I wasn’t manning up and giving charlo credit for beating GGG in a make believe nonfight
Well yeah man it's a theory. The good thing about the theoretical win is it exposes if you are a fanboy or just hate on a set of fighters