No, it’s a goofy non scenario. But I’ll play along. You’ve posited a theory that I would make excuses for trip or not give charlo credit but you have nothing to base that theory on. Long as a win is legit n on the up n up I give any fighter credit for a win. Don’t know why you’d think I wouldn’t. Seems a stupid theory to concoct n put forth though accusing me of fanboyism when the guy you’re cheering for couldn’t beat an inactive old man. Whatever. Also seems weird considering you won’t even acknowledge that Canelos record is garbage. Got beat by one of the same guys who beat your boy charlo and twice by GGG. Whom you seem so desperate in every thread to discredit. You ain’t exposing anything except your own fanboyism and haterism.
Total clown. By your own logic, stop discrediting pacs win over delahoya. Something I’ve seen you doing on multiple occasions. N don’t try to squeak out of that by labeling me super pacquiao fan. I’m merely demonstrating your own contradictory fanboy hateristic nature.
They should do that card again - Charlo v Harrison II , Charlo v Korobov II. Thats a good show for the fans
And you know what happens to physical beasts with a little bit of talent? They usually end up getting schooled by superior technicians, just ask Murat Gassiev.
Aint no headhunter like Charlo doing anything to Canelo, he has a field day lighting him up on the counter for 12 rounds. Jacobs as well. A ten year career and the best wins on his resume is Trout and Martiroysan lol
Physical beast's?! They weigh about 170lbs.. ON PEDS too Hardly genetic freaks. People are always too enamored by shredded guys... Time & again in boxing I've seen muscular boxers get taken a part by men with fleshy torsos, or men who are quite underwhelming build wise.. Mikey, Fury, Kovalev, Calzaghe, Pavlik etc are just a few that spring to mind..