The chin and defensive skills of Joe Louis

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Glass City Cobra, Jan 23, 2024.


  1. HomicideHank

    HomicideHank I believe in the transmigration of souls Full Member

    796
    542
    Nov 27, 2023
    Neither had the speed or the reflexes at that point all they had was will.
    I don't think you know what context means mate...
    No need to make up that stuff about 'multiple trainers and historians' to justify what is clearly an opinion. Bit silly really.
     
  2. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    10,596
    18,178
    Jan 6, 2017
    Yeah Im totally just making those numbers up, nobody else thinks 26-30 is a fighters prime.

    "On average, fighters tend to start hitting their peak at age 28-29 and continue at that level until age 34-35"

    Source:
    https://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic....fighters tend to,is often their 36th birthday.

    Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/MMA/s/MnWGcjpx59

    On average, what's considered "prime year" age in MMA?

    In other sports like NBA, they would say players start to peak around their prime age of 27. And would start declining around 32 or so.

    Does MMA fighters who fights at the UFC level have something similar or age isn't really huge factor?

    what's considered young and what's considered age of decline?

    Responses:

    "I'd say like 27-32 in this sport "

    "If you were to take an overall average, fighters' primes would most likely fall within the window of 27 to 32 as you mentioned. However, it needs be stated that where an individual fighter's prime years take place will depend on their weight class. Given that strength and power fades at a slower rate than speed and agility, people competing in lighter weight classes (where speed and agility are more important) will cross into their primes at younger ages. Early thirties could be considered old for a flyweight but young for a heavyweight".

    Source:
    https://www.reddit.com/r/MMA/s/LigNnjgHZH

    "This is basically a function of three variables, not just one: physique, skills and experience.

    The physique tends to peak at 30 to 35, and deteriorate from that on"

    Source: https://www.quora.com/How-long-does...rime-last-and-at-what-age-is-the-average-peak

    "Generally speaking, a boxer hits his or her physical prime between the ages of 28 and 35."

    "Your muscles are at their strongest when you're 25, although for the next 10 or 15 years they stay almost as hefty"

    Source:
    https://www.businessinsider.com/sci...anguage-is-easiest-when-youre-around-7-or-8-1

    "They usually peak at around age 28-30, it really depends on the fighter though"

    https://boxing.sports.narkive.com/iLPoFQmA/at-what-age-are-professional-boxers-at-their-prime

    "28-32

    slightly earlier for fighters who rely on athleticism, slightly older for fighters who rely on skill"

    "I'd say most fighters primes are somewhere between 24 - 34"

    "I would say 25 to 33-ish for most fighters."

    source: https://www.*******.com/forums/boxing-forums/non-stop-boxing/822871-prime-years-for-a-boxer
     
  3. HomicideHank

    HomicideHank I believe in the transmigration of souls Full Member

    796
    542
    Nov 27, 2023
    We're talking SPECIFICALLY about Joe Frazier mate, we're not talking about the average fighter/athlete. Are you incapable of reading?
     
  4. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    10,596
    18,178
    Jan 6, 2017
    You claimed that I was just "making up" the age range of 26-30 as being where most boxers are in their prime. I cited more than half a dozen sources backing up what I said. I'm terribly sorry that you look incredibly dumb right now.
     
    Rubber Glove Sandwich likes this.
  5. HomicideHank

    HomicideHank I believe in the transmigration of souls Full Member

    796
    542
    Nov 27, 2023
    I said you were making up the age range in which Frazier was in his prime name a trainer or a historian who thought Frazier was still as good post FOTC. I never deviated from talking about Frazier, you're bringing in generalized standards into the discussion when we're talking about the career one man which doesn't make an iota of sense.
    You're the dumb one mate you aren't even focused on the premise of our conversation. Comprehension really isn't your strong suit.
    If you can't see that then I don't know what more I can do for you. Have a nice life.
     
  6. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    10,596
    18,178
    Jan 6, 2017
    I didn't deviate from talking about Frazier either. You didn't address anything I brought up, like the fact Frazier wasn't in any particularly difficult, taxing, or damaging fights other than FOTC prior to meeting Foreman. I read his biography and Frazier himself didn't think he was shot after that fight, nor his own trainers Futch and Durham so that's all the validation I need lol.

    He was smack dab in the middle of his prime at 29 and undefeated, which is right in range of where the vast majority of people say a boxer is in their prime. I have cited more than a dozen sources including Frazier himself. As usual, you have no idea what you're talking about and you are flat out wrong. I'm sorry you never grew up with a dad who taught you the first step about manhood which is accountability.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,248
    Feb 15, 2006
    Even allowing for the non participation of communist countries, the available evidence suggest that there were more boxers globally in the 1930s, than there are today.

    Obviously this is a difficult thing to estimate, and it is based on the number of boxing gyms and boxing cards, but it would be more than dangerous to assume that Louis was a big fish in a small pond.

    As you say some of them look unimpressive on film, but then some of them look absolutely fantastic on film.
    So ten best opponents beaten for each fighter.

    You might do OK with the above men, but after that you are going to start to struggle, especially if you can't use the same opponent twice.
     
  8. Melankomas

    Melankomas Prime Jeffries would demolish a grizzly in 2 Full Member

    6,972
    8,631
    Dec 18, 2022
    This thread is the BF24 equivalent of the Hundred Years War
     
    janitor and George Crowcroft like this.
  9. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,903
    Mar 3, 2019
    It's got a long way to go to claim that title.
     
  10. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    10,596
    18,178
    Jan 6, 2017
    You... didn't.... address what I said.

    I can't make things more explicitly clear than this: There may have been more boxers in Louis era in terms of sheer numbers, but the quality wasn't particularly high outside of a handful of superb boxers such as Schmeling, Walcott, Louis himself, etc. For every quality boxer like them, you had several mediocre or downright terrible boxers.

    No, I wouldn't struggle at all. There's plenty more such as Liston, Foreman, Bowe, Vitali, hell I think even Dempsey would pass the test.

    Your turn.

    Explain to me why there are at least 7 other champion HW boxers, several of whom that I would NOT give a 9/10 defensive rating, who do not have 2 KO losses and 10 knockdowns on their record.

    You can only keep milking the "Louis faced more ranked opponents" argument for so long. Especially because as I said above, some of those "ranked opponents" simply do not have very good records and do not look very good on film such as Braddock and Galento.
     
  11. Ioakeim Tzortzakis

    Ioakeim Tzortzakis Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,774
    6,098
    Aug 27, 2020
    It would have already gotten the title had Mendoza been the one to make the thread.
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,248
    Feb 15, 2006
    Don't you give these "terrible boxers" some credit, for being successful in an era populated by men like Schmeling Walcott etic?

    Personally I see the era very differently to you.

    It didn't produce greats in the same way the 70s and 90s did, but the division was still a meat grinder to rise through.
    You just stepped on a bear trap here.

    Give me a list of Liston's ten best wins, or Bowe's or Vitally's.

    You will exhaust the elite fighters very quickly with these men's resumes.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,248
    Feb 15, 2006
    I am confronted with the dilemma of do I respond to Glass City Cobra, if it is two spaced from slipping off the bottom of the page?
     
  14. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,432
    9,421
    Jul 15, 2008
    Janitor, you are tireless and this is a time I feel it is justified. (for whatever little that's worth. lol)
     
  15. It's Ovah

    It's Ovah I am very feel me good. Full Member

    14,882
    19,143
    Sep 5, 2016
    Louis's chin was pretty poor when looked at historically. He had good recuperative powers though, and good instincts when hurt that allowed him to turn fights around. But anyone getting hurt and nearly stopped by a SMW can't be said to have a great HW chin on the level of a Tyson or a Foreman, let alone anything approaching a McCall, Tua, Chuvalo etc. If someone like Joshua was nearly stopped by Dmitri Bivol fighting at his natural weight class would you consider them to have a great HW chin? I doubt it. Not when HWs get roasted for being dropped by cruiserweights, and those are huge men by any metric. I don't see why Louis should get a pass here.

    On the second point, Louis's defence was also quite porous and he was prone to getting tagged by jabs and short chopping shots that often seemed to catch him off guard and badly stun him or knock him off his feet. His pull counter was decent though, and his offensive skills often acted as his defence since fighters often found it difficult to mount a sustained attack on him unless he was seriously buzzed. Overall his defence was better than his chin, but again not on the level of any really good defensive stylists.

    As for how he managed to carve such a career with these attributes, it's down to a combination of things: great offensive skills, recuperative abilities and heart of Louis, subpar opposition a lot of the time, historically smaller or lesser punchers compared to fighters from the 70s/80s onwards, and a boxing environment in which taller opponents were more prone to giving up their advantages to fight on the inside, which greatly benefitted Louis's style.