The Classic BN24 Hall of Legends: Rules, Opinions, Link to the HoF polling threads, 2023 intake chat

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Sep 18, 2022.



  1. Greg Price99

    Greg Price99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    6,175
    Dec 17, 2018
    It begins with I ;-)
     
    Jel likes this.
  2. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,352
    11,913
    Oct 20, 2017
    Good point - I should have said ‘an extra I’!
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  3. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,352
    11,913
    Oct 20, 2017
    Even before the Heavyweight list has appeared, I’ve got my 7 entrants locked and loaded.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,265
    38,821
    Mar 21, 2007
    For a giggle, post them in here and we'll see where you end up.

    Nobody else though - don't want this to become an unofficial HW thread - but let's see!
     
  5. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,352
    11,913
    Oct 20, 2017
    Joe Louis
    Muhammad Ali
    Larry Holmes
    Rocky Marciano
    George Foreman
    Joe Frazier
    Jack Johnson

    With an apology to Jack Dempsey who just missed out. I figured Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson and Ezzard Charles would not be part of the long list.
     
    McGrain likes this.
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,265
    38,821
    Mar 21, 2007
    Qft.
     
    Jel likes this.
  7. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,352
    11,913
    Oct 20, 2017
    It might change a little if Sam Langford is listed.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  8. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,273
    15,985
    Jun 25, 2014
    Where is Floyd Patterson in the Light Heavyweight poll? He was the #1 Light Heavyweight contender when he moved up.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,265
    38,821
    Mar 21, 2007
    You’ll be pleased to hear you can (not) vote for him in the HW poll.
     
  10. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,112
    7,534
    Aug 15, 2018
    Looking forward to see the Heavy nominees…not an easy choice 15-20
     
  11. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,273
    15,985
    Jun 25, 2014
    Ezzard Charles went 30-2 as a light heavyweight and became the #1 contender at 175.

    Patterson went 26-1 as a light heavyweight and became the #1 contender at 175.

    Neither challenged for the light heavyweight title but Floyd destroyed the light heavyweight champ Moore in a vacant heavyweight title fight.

    And Floyd won the heavyweight title two more times than Ezzard Charles did. He's rated on most pound-for-pound lists.

    Seems like a huge oversight. Floyd was as much a light heavy as Ezzard was.

    But, continue on.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,265
    38,821
    Mar 21, 2007
    Most people don’t feel this way, and so wouldn’t feel it a huge oversight.

    Both fighters can be nominated for the HoF so it makes little difference.
     
    JohnThomas1 and George Crowcroft like this.
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,265
    38,821
    Mar 21, 2007
    In fact, it was pretty straight forwards. Not so sure how easy picking seven will be though…
     
  14. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,273
    15,985
    Jun 25, 2014
    Sure it makes a difference. People act like Ezzard Charles went 100-0 at light heavyweight.

    Charles basically had as many fights as Patterson at the weight and earned the same ranking Patterson did at the weight and moved up like Patterson, only Floyd was heavyweight champion more times.

    You only added their WHOLE CAREER and Pound-for-Pound rating to INCLUDE so Ezzard Charles would be rated higher.

    But, using the criteria you designed for Charles, Patterson would probably end up higher on the list than Charles.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,265
    38,821
    Mar 21, 2007
    That is an absurd and bizarre accusation.

    I understand you are currently having conversations about Patterson and Charles elsewhere on the forum that are difficult for you but that has absolutely nothing to do with this thread or this process.

    That the whole, rather work intensive process is just a facade to artificially inflate one fighter’s polling numbers in direct relation to arguments you’re having elsewhere is…a worrying conclusion.

    I mean I’m not even arguing with you in these other threads.

    Take it elsewhere.
     
    swagdelfadeel and JohnThomas1 like this.