The DEFINITIVE STATEMENT on the MARGOrito-Williams-Quintana TRIANGLE

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Suge Green, Aug 5, 2008.


  1. Suge Green

    Suge Green Boxing Junkie banned

    7,678
    3
    Sep 15, 2006
    If Quintana beat Margarito 1 year ago...and if Quintana held the most recent victory in his bouts with Williams, we would all have forgot about Paul Williams already...that however is not how it went down.

    ...but since this is reality and not an alternate universe, Quintana is the one who doesn't factor into the equation at this point.

    Williams has one loss...which he avenged very recently.

    Williams faced Margorito...and beat him recently, within the last year.

    Williams is the man right now...those of you making the point that Margo should give Carlos a rematch because he received one, are off base. As champion Williams needs to face other champs or the next conteder.
    If Carlos wants to fight again after just being dispatched of by Williams, he needs to pick up another strap.

    Those who argue on behalf of Margo's resume need to stop...for about 2 years Antonio has been bitching that he couldn't get a fight with any top guys, now his huggers want to plead his case based on his resume...I'm sure he'd be pleased and puzzled that you are so impressed with it.

    I'm not saying Margo can't beat Williams, he certainly has a chance...but there is no way that it goes without saying, the events of the recent past are still too vivid in peoples minds. Some balance is called for.
     
  2. Suge Green

    Suge Green Boxing Junkie banned

    7,678
    3
    Sep 15, 2006
    The silence of the Margo Marks is deafening...sound reasoning prevails.
     
  3. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    I typically agree with you but you are offbase here. Ranking is determined by accomplishments, not any tried and failed concept of "beat the man" nonsense.

    Margarito by definition was not the man nor was he number 1 even when he fought Paul Williams. The win is a credible one for Williams but it is still only one.

    What you are doing is granting Williams the number one spot on the back of Margarito's performance against Cotto. In a boxing world full of inconsistencies this is a bad idea. As if that Margarito is the Margarito from a year before or after is taking on the assumption that boxers don't change when they certainly do.

    Also there is no guarantee that because he beat Margarito that he'd also beat Cotto, or Cintron, or Clottey for that matter. You do not inherit the wins of your opposition. You simply add that name to your own resume.

    The only time a man should supplant another is when he carries the title of champion. The head honcho. If we tried to use the same system for rankings it would fall apart quickly. Particularly in a competitive weight class where the top 10 win and lose to one another on a yearly basis.

    Therefore the only objective way to rank a guy is on his resume. Plain and simple. Any other concept is abstract and only for subjective rankings.
     
  4. Suge Green

    Suge Green Boxing Junkie banned

    7,678
    3
    Sep 15, 2006
    ...and I typically agree with you.

    However it is a mistake to use resume in place of actual history to make a comparison between fighters...especially when it is very recent history in boxing terms.
    If the fighters have not fought than an analysis of resume may be useful, but not in place of the actual competition that it seeks to determine the outcome of.
    Listing all of the other little points are simply interesting tidbits that would be worth speculating about if they have not been in the ring already.
     
  5. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    Here is the problem. You have 10 guys, not 2. If it were just Margarito and Williams in the whole division then yes, your argument would hold water. As it is, there are 8 other guys making a strong case for their own ranking. And it is simply unfair to use the "beat the man" system for rankings, not just champions (which is not how it is done currently).

    Imagine for example if the NFL or NBA tried to use such a system. If playoff bids were instead determined on who beat who, rather than who had the most impressive season. One team with an absolute crap season could still get a buy into the playoffs because they hold one win over the top team. They could play terrible all year around, then show up the top team on one night and suddenly surpass everyone else who worked hard all season. That doesn't make sense at all.

    The same fact holds true in boxing. You can not rank a guy higher as though he inherited the wins of his opponent. He doesn't. Paul Williams is not even the number two guy. That spot belongs to Miguel Cotto for his accomplishments at welter, which still today outshine Williams.
     
  6. Suge Green

    Suge Green Boxing Junkie banned

    7,678
    3
    Sep 15, 2006
    One reason I prefer boxing to the other sports you mentioned is, when the fighters are in the ring with each other...that is ultimately what settles it.

    When the discussion is between Margo-Williams-Quintana, it's easy to analyze the situation. Looking at everybody else does nothing but confuse the issue, and make cases based on factors other than head to head competition.

    I like Clottey, but Margo dealt with him...I like Cotto, but Margo dealt with him...I like Margo, but Williams dealt with him.

    Beating other guys besides who beat you recently, especially when that guy who beat you has a belt, is a secondary issue.

    When a champ loses his belt he is not #2...he goes to the back of the line, or tries to grab a rung on the way down the ladder to pull himself back up. If he can score an immediate rematch and win, than he reclaims his position...unless a rival champ holding an unavenged win over him is active.

    This is not the olympics, f*ck a cumulative score.
     
  7. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,049
    1,098
    Aug 6, 2005
    You probably got few responses because your damn post is almost unreadable. Learn to be concise.

    The only way to sort it out is Williams vs Margarito II. Quintana was a fluke, and we knew it at the time, and Williams showed it by destorying Quintana in the rematch, making the 1st fight a moot point.

    I think Margarito would be a heavy heavy favorite in a rematch with Williams.
     
  8. Suge Green

    Suge Green Boxing Junkie banned

    7,678
    3
    Sep 15, 2006
    ...and you should learn to be relevant...

    "I think Margorito would be a heavy heavy favorite iin a rematch with Williams..."


    No ****...

    If I want a response I can get it, don't need advice from a "master of the obvious." What a mark...
     
  9. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    But the division is not just Margo-Williams-Quintana. Therefore what you suggest could only matter in a subjective way. Williams is your number one guy. He is not the number one guy in the objective scheme of things. For all we know Williams loses his next fight or Margarito loses his next fight. That would surely send your system into disarray. Mine on the other hand (the one the world uses) would be perfectly fine with some minor adjustments. Ironically, you make it more complicated than it has to be by trying to make it simpler.
     
  10. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Margarito K.O. Williams in the rematch.
     
  11. Suge Green

    Suge Green Boxing Junkie banned

    7,678
    3
    Sep 15, 2006
    I don't think so...you are discarding actual toe-to-toe performance in favor of an on paper analysis based on a cumulative system...the way I choose to evaluate fighters is based on their performance in the ring against each other...it's up to them as individiuals. It' snot always possible, but in this case there is history...the fact that it's such recent history determines that it is most relevant.

    I don't seek to determine the rankings of the entire division this way, which as you pointed out could be a problematic task...only to clarify the status of it's champions, in relation to one another.
     
  12. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Margo wasn't really the man when Williams beat him so its not the same as if Williams beat Margo after Margo beat Cotto.

    The way you put it, Williams could fight a tomato can and even if Margarito knocked out Judah, Clottey, Berto, Cotto again, Collazo, and Mosley in the next 6 months, Williams would still be the top dog in the division
     
  13. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    I understand that you are only considering the champions. To me they are just titlists (glorified contenders) and that includes Margarito. He happens to just be the number 1 ranked welter based on his resume. There is no welterweight champion in my eyes.
     
  14. Suge Green

    Suge Green Boxing Junkie banned

    7,678
    3
    Sep 15, 2006
    No he would just be an asterisk on Margarito's record. Any reasonable fan would have to ask, why not avenge your loss.

    It's like with WLAD, and I hate to bring him into it, but he's actually a good example here...

    When Brewster was still a HW Champ I would not rank WLAD above him until he either...

    1. Avenged his loss to Brewster...or

    2. Defeated Sergei Lyakhovich after he defeated Brewster...or

    3. Defeat Briggs after he beat Sergei

    WLAD did a good job by beating Brewster in the rematch...and also defeating Briggs' conqueror IGGY. Completely clarifying the situation, and eliminating any detractors claims to his position.

    As a side note, and there unfortunately always is one with KLIT... Brewster was on medical suspension in the U.S. when that fight took place in Germany. Here's an HBO bigwig claimng later that they didn't
    know at the time...

    Ross Greenburg says, “We didn’t know at the time that Brewster was on medical suspension when he fought Klitschko.”
    -SOURCE
    [url]
    This content is protected
    [/url]
    2008 Wed 28-May-2008
     
  15. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    So if the scenario i mentioned happened, you would put Margarito above Williams?