****** I think Mosley is a great fight for him if he takes it, and a great win if he wins. I have said numerous times that I dont mosley is shot, and if he loses it would be because mayweather is the better man. Your whole post to me is void, and your back to square 1= looking like a dumbass
And you must have had your head up your ass if you think what I said isnt true. Mayweather fans textually destroy all of his upcoming opponets, but after he beats them expect him to get credit for it. You dont know ****
As usual you cornballs are caught up projecting your homo-erotic fantasies. Anyway, why are you sitting here contradicting yourself? The "*****s" you are referring to are giving fight analysis. Clowns such as yourself are giving BS emotional opinions. Then the "*****s" are correct for all the reasons they stated. You fools hype fights that make no sense. Just like you fools think Manny is the end all be all. Manny knows he would have gotten that ass tapped. Just like Marg. Just like Cotto. Williams? There is a legit question mark there. I didn't see anyone else stepping up to get him out of there yet only FMJ is held to the fire for not facing a 6'2" WW with ZERO fan base and earning power (at that time). You are a clown.
And what analisys do you make asswipe? all your posts look like love letters directed to Fraud for **** sake. stop acting like you're some kind of expert you're not fooling anyone.
We would know that, only fraud never faught them, now did he. If you *****s, as you called yourself, are correct for all the reason you state, what does that say about his choice of opponets. Your bragging because your analysis of floyd's win over someone who would obviously lose to him was correct? You must see how stupid you sound. "See we were right! Floyd picked a short armed midget who had no chance to beat him to fight......and then he beat him. Yay! *****s-1, Haters-0"
First of all... I am your Daddy and quite ashamed of you. Second of all I am no more an expert than anyone else. What the hell is an expert? Just a person with an opinion. What separates one from another is what they back up their opinions with. That being said, I have ALWAYS said that the Mosley fight is a pointless exercise. Cotto out boxed him. What you think Mayweather won't? You sheep are fooled by Arum's lies and think Mosley is the man. Fine. So be it. The facts are prize fighters fight for prizes and Bradley is the better fight. He brings an unknown element to the mix. Sad part is that because you *******s are so dumb that fight would not be sell-able. So we won't see the better fight. So you Tards are messing the game up not Mayweather. Oh well, we will have to see Mosley get pot shotted and turned around all night.
Explain to me how is Bradley a tougher fight for fraud than Mosley is *******? Mosley is bigger,faster,stronger,hits harder, has a great chin,has been in against the better comp etc. tell me one thing that Bradley does better than Mosley? You being the know nothing fanboy that you are you probably think Bradley is better than Shane cause hes undefeated and Shane isnt.
First of all, you ignoramuses have no grasp of history. This is why you don't understand why the fights were not made. You just throw out names with no regard to surrounding circumstances. FMJ is a PRIZE FIGHTER. He fights for money. He takes the fight that the people want to see. People wanted to see these fights. People DIDN'T and DON'T want to see the fights that make the most sense or are most challenging. He fights the next sucker you guys line up... As he should. So as long as we are in fantasy land I guess you do sound intelligent and Mayweather ducked all those guys. In the real world they had no fan base, worked for that snake Arum, lost fights key fights, turned down fights then wanted fights later, etc... :deal
I've definately noticed that. Almost everyone but the "*****s" were saying Shane would walk through Floyd, and now that the fight looks like it's going to happen, more and more it's Shane is too old, another cherry pick for Floyd.
Very FEW have said Shane would walk through Floyd. And very few are saying SHane is too old. There's discussion of whether he's past his prime (yes, he is), but that's it. Try to keep it in perspective.
How the hell is Mosley "faster" when he couldn't beat Cotto to the punch? WTF? Bradley is younger, faster, faster footed and yes, the lack of losses might make him that much more tenacious. IMHO, the "0" doesn't mean much but is still a factor. I am not saying Mosley isn't a great fight. It will be. Mosley also stands a decnt chance at winning. The B side is what was his last loss? Cotto. How did he lose? By being out boxed by a guy who's Plan A isn't to box. It ruffles you Haters feathers, but it seems this fight will go the same way. With elite fighters though there is always a chance for it to go differently. So go watch Mayweather's last fights. Which was the most competitive? Zab Judah. He is nowhere near the strongest WW. He is fast as hell though and due to a lack of size respect Mayweather was more willing to trade. Bradley fool!
Are you suggesting SHane isn't faster then about all of Floyd's previous opponents? And you are basing it one a fight vs. Cotto? atsch Congrats....you just found a way to give Floyd very little credit if he beats Shane.
If you don't see the contradiction in blaming the people fueling the hysteria not getting the blame versus the people trying to calm the hysteria getting the blame then you are a fool. It is the exact opposite of the point you are trying to make. Maybe FMJ should take the competitive fights that nobody wants to see? Yeah he will be broke, but you will have fun. Hope your ignorant ass plans to feed his kids too.