The Fifty Greatest Lightweights of all Time

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, May 29, 2016.


  1. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    I'm not familiar enough with the other guys in that tier other than say Armstrong to provide a convincing enough argument.
     
  2. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,662
    8,115
    Feb 11, 2005
    Ramirez might be worth considering for the bottom tier. Mando Ramos, too.

    Lightweight, like middleweight, is hell on earth to rate, though. Lots of really good fighters in the lower tiers.
     
  3. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,105
    12,105
    Mar 2, 2006
    Sammy Angott way too high, Alexis Arguello too low and Rodolfo Gonzalez nowhere in sight?? But hey, that's just my taste.
     
  4. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,513
    Jul 28, 2004
    Looks like a good list to me McGrain.:good
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,851
    45,594
    Mar 21, 2007
    Gonzalez is 3-3 versus ranked men.

    Angott beat: Bob Montgomery (lots), Willie Pep, Lew Jenkins and, by my count, seven other ranked men. That's outstanding.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,851
    45,594
    Mar 21, 2007
    I've found lightweight easier so far tbh, but that might just be me getting used to it.

    Ramos and Ramirez both got a look and came up short.
     
  7. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,848
    2,321
    Jul 11, 2005
    Why include non-lightweight Jack Blackburn and do it twice, in tiers 4 and 5?
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,851
    45,594
    Mar 21, 2007
    You wouldn't include Blackburn at all? He'd be excluded?

    Are some of his reported weights wrong? I'd stretch the definition to either 137.5 or 138.
     
  9. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,105
    12,105
    Mar 2, 2006

    I totally understand if your rankings are on a numbers basis. I rank on head-to-head and I'll get intrinsic on what I have seen in a fighter that I am blown away by and, conversely, what I am unimpressed by - despite the stats. if I was to do a rankings on my opinion on fighters in the same tiered style you did, we would have a completely different set of rankings. So, I do understand where you're coming from.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,851
    45,594
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think i'll introduce Berg for Rocky Kansas OR Blackburn.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,851
    45,594
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well when you post an equal number of losses to top men as you do wins, surely that's an enormous inhibitor on claims you can make on his behalf, head to head? I mean whoever you have him beating, you presumably don't have him beating Guts or Cervantes?
     
  12. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    131
    Jul 20, 2004
    Stevie Johnston and Jose Luis Castillo are IMO more deserving of being there than Crawford and Casamayor but overall its a good list.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,851
    45,594
    Mar 21, 2007
    Castillo is on; Stevie is an interesting call.
     
  14. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,662
    8,115
    Feb 11, 2005
    Juan Manuel Marquez probably warrants inclusion for the same reason that Chavez, does. Quality wins during a short stay and became lineal at the weight.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,851
    45,594
    Mar 21, 2007
    2 wins over ranked opponents. There are guys with more who aren't touching the list.