The "Froch hit nothing but air all night" Myth EXPOSED!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hopkins54, Oct 21, 2009.


  1. zicas

    zicas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,003
    457
    Aug 12, 2007
    Is this guy serious
     
  2. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    so what exactly is was the title in boxing you won?
     
  3. mariancobretti

    mariancobretti Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,802
    0
    May 2, 2009
    what are the compubox stats?
     
  4. StreetsOfGold

    StreetsOfGold Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,252
    1
    Nov 9, 2008
    compubox

    Dirrell

    literally running away - 5 rounds
    illegally low ducks -50
    falling over to avoid a punch landing -30
    lunging forward and holding to avoid a punch landing -50
     
  5. nipplefloss

    nipplefloss Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,210
    0
    Aug 25, 2006
    Of the three times he ducks in that image only one is probably below the beltline, and, you know, Froch was too busy missing punches for it to matter.
     
  6. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Don't you have a poster to go expose fruitball lol...
     
  7. dbouziane

    dbouziane ............. Full Member

    11,049
    27
    Nov 4, 2007
    dirrell apologizes for ducking like that...he now understands he has to remain stationary for froch to hit him in the back of the head
     
  8. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    " i am a titlist in this sport" your words not mine,what is the title,answer the question!
     
  9. StreetsOfGold

    StreetsOfGold Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,252
    1
    Nov 9, 2008
    No sorry only him and floyd mayweather seem to do this and I don't think it is fair or legal and doesn't belong in this sport.
    It's time to draw a line and say no more.
     
  10. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    And Froch??? 700 thrown, only 22 landed. Froch says after the fight that the guy didn't want to stand there and fight his fight lol.
     
  11. D-Wreck

    D-Wreck Active Member Full Member

    640
    0
    Sep 16, 2009
    Great statement. There is no doubt that an argument can be made for both fighters.

    I thought Dirrell landed some nice shots throughout the fight. Froch landed his jab with some consistency in the early and middle rounds, but then stopped using it.

    I think if Dirrell had taken more of an offensive style, he would have been awarded the decision. The fact that Froch stalked him the whole fight, and Dirrell's constant back-pedaling, complaining, and clinching made it hard to give Dirrell the nod.

    All that said, it was a controversial decision, and a less-than-entertaining fight.
     
  12. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    No you punk
     
  13. StreetsOfGold

    StreetsOfGold Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,252
    1
    Nov 9, 2008
    He was talking about the way he basically ran away fell over and held for 8 rounds anything to stop froch actually trying to land a punch.
     
  14. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    The fight was a close fight. Froch won the early rounds on aggression, and Dirrell came on late. I thought Dirrell won, but this is not highway robbery.
     
  15. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    people need to let this **** go.. its not getting resolved anytime soon.. no matter what your argument is there will be an argument to counter it.. its a vicious circle..