The G-Man vs Carl Froch.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hussleman, Jun 14, 2011.


  1. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    21
    Sep 30, 2009
    He would out-weigh Froch by 15-20lbs.
     
  2. Tully

    Tully Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,803
    0
    Mar 28, 2010
    Thought i remembered gerald moved up to fight benn..he must have been going through hell to make 160
     
  3. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Well the polls indicates what I believed which is a G-Man's victory. I don't see Froch surviving those shots by the G-Man at all.
     
  4. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,224
    55
    Mar 23, 2009


    Froch has a Good chin on him .

    Mcclellan breaks right through it .

    Agreed.
     
  5. mclellan had too much power and speed for froch to fight with his hands down i dont care how solid his chin was if he fought g man like he did taylor or dirrell he would be brutally koed they stunned him and they didnt have half the power gerald did
     
  6. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    102
    Dec 26, 2009
    Come on, McClellan wins hands down.
     
  7. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Agreed, G-man had power to hurt some HW's and Ko some LHW's, seriously.
     
  8. Big Left

    Big Left Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,243
    20
    Dec 12, 2009
    If McClellan does not knock out Froch in the first 4 rounds I think Froch would win by decison.

    Not really sure if McClellan could KO Froch.
     
  9. Andy McNab

    Andy McNab Boxing Addict banned

    5,092
    1
    Sep 12, 2010
    Froch is tough, has a heart of stone but Benn was also hard as ****ing nails, if you did not knock him out he never stopped coming, I dunno who is the more efficient fighter but Froch would take a backwards step before Benn would have even thought about doing so.

    I'd say a close fight, Froch can always fight a full 12, we never saw Gerald do this so maybe in the later rounds things get interesting.
     
  10. Threetime no1

    Threetime no1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,890
    94
    Oct 29, 2010
    That wasn't my point mate, stop being picky. I said Froch has got a good amateur background, how many British amateurs have won a medal at the worlds?
    My point was Froch has underrated skills, because he can look slow and awkward.
    For the record Benn was 22 when he won his ABA title in '86, just 2 years older than Froch was when he won his world bronze. Benn was retired as a pro at the age of 32. Froch is now 33 and will be 34 in a couple of weeks (i know this because his birthday is the day before mine) and he is still going strong. That 's not because his better, it's because his a different fighter with a different career. My point here is, age has **** all to do with it, everyone progresses differently.
    If your getting picky because you think i'm underselling Benn, then here listen. Benn is one of my heroes, i followed him religiously has a fighter, and was gutted when he was defeated. The only other two fighters i have supported as strongly and passionately were Hagler and Lewis.
    Is it because i don't see the G-man blowing him out? It's a possibilty of course, McClellan's right hand was a phenomenal, and Froch is a sucker for it, but Froch has earned a lot of respect and deservedly so, that is why i wouldn't underestimate him with McClellan, or any ****er at super-middle.
    I've noticed over the last couple of weeks you have a strong love for British super-middles, and middleweights in general. Well your not the only one.
    Anyway if your gonna be picky mate, then do it with something worthwhile. I'm making honest observations about Froch, it's opinion mate.
    :thumbsup