The G Man Imo would have koed Ggg in less than 3 round. GGG has very good poer but Gerald McClennen power elite great and he did it with more ease! What do you all think?
It would be a hell of a fight, but my heart would be with GGG, simply because the G-Man was an absolute scumbag, a poor excuse for a human being, the man shot his own dog in the head because it lost a fight, what goes around comes around Gerald
Honestly Gerald McClellan struggled to make weight and dehydrated himself which does have an effect of punch resistance (that thin layer of fluid in your skull that cushions the impact between the skull and your brain) as good as I thought Gman was there is still the point that GGG would viciously KO him if this fight were to be held at 160/168
I'd favour G Man over GGG at the moment but only because McClellan is the more tested and known quantity, with time Golovkin could go on to prove he is the far superior fighter. McClellan while possessing a good jab, size and frightening power was over rated in my opinion. He fell in love with his power and neglected his boxing skills, he was a better fighter with Steward. The Benn fight showed how easy he was to hit, how easily he was countered, though he also displayed a chin of epic proportions he took shots from Benn that had Barkley all over the place and also took the best of Jackson. His chin is why I would favour McClellan. Golovkin's chin has stood up to everything so far but is not as tested as G Man's. I think he has better all round technique and better balance and poise. But in the end he's unproven on the level that G Man has performed at.
I think the gman has the greater,more vicious knock outs against the better opposition.. Anyone remember John Mugabi ?himself a great great knockout artist with 38 wins-38 ko's before the gman fight,gman blasted him out within 1 like no other,could GGG do something like that? doubt it..McClellan's power and ruthlessness was far superior to GGG