The Gary Lockett I/C Ballistic Anti-Hypetrain Rocket *Caution: Point Away From Face*

Pavlik KO9 Zuniga -- now rated #13 at SMW and the current IBO titlist.
Pavlik KO6 McKart -- Former 2 time 154 titlist, and former 160 pound NABF titlist.
Pavlik KO4 Pierre -- 18-3-0 at the time with an 80% KO ratio.
Pavlik KO8 Zertuche -- You could tear Zertuche's arms off and he'd fight ya with his teeth!
Pavlik KO7 Miranda -- Regarded as a monster set to absolutely dominate at 160.
Pavlik KO7 Taylor -- Universally recognized middleweight champ.
Pavlik UD12 Taylor -- With injuries to both hands Pavlik outboxed "the more talented" boxer.

Ya I guess you're right. Pavlik is just the latest American hype jobatsch

Shut the **** up ******.


Boo

 

Boo Radley your the biggest idiot on this forum.

His post was a ****ing joke, how on earth can you not see that ?

haha the way you've charged in defending pavlik nearly as funny as the first post itself.

 

A joke and stupid thread.

 

Oh yeah and just to add fire.


Calzaghe resume vs Pavlik resume

Eubank beats Zuniga
Mitchell beats Mckart
Brewer beats Pierre
Lacy beats Zertuche
Reid beats Miranda
Kessler beats Taylor

Calzaghe beats Pavlik


Now sit down.

 

Kessler beats Taylor??? Now I know for sure THAT YOU ARE A ****ING ******!

 

Now why don't you make a poll on that? Considering he's such a ****** he'll be in the minority eh?

You are a ****ing joke, and can't see the wood for the trees with Pavlik's balls covering your eyes

 

Yeah. That's how boxing matches are settled. Internet polls.atsch

 

Polls have nothing to do with it. The majority picked Lacey over calzaghe. The Majority picked Miranda and Taylor over Pavlik. I picked the winner every ****ing time. The only fights I've been wrong about in the last few years were Delahoya/Mayweather and Pavlik/McKart. That's 2 fights wrong and probably 30 where I picked a winner. Can you say the same? Since you're the same clown that said Slappy joe is more accomplished than Hopkins, somehow I doubt it.

 

LOL !!

I think a lot of people on here think thats the truth

 

That wasn't my point you dumb ****. If its so obvious, and this guy is such a ****** for picking Kessler to beat Taylor there should be a huge disparity in the results. Unless every person that picks him is a ******

Now **** off and take your emoticons with you.

 

Not big on sarcasm are you:-(

 

Of those listed, Miranda and Taylor are the only names worth anything. Zuniga... rated at 13, wow. Look at the ratings of any division and there is crap in the top ten due to politics never mind outside the top ten. The WBC have Timothy Bradley as the number 1 contender to face Witter for the 140 belt.atsch

Pavlik is not a hype job, he is a very good fighter, with great power, great workrate and an excellent attitude towards the fight game. He is a real blessing for boxing.

BUT, to argue his competition outside of the last two is good, is disingenuous or delusional. And your twisting of facts to support your argument is poor.

Quoting McKart as a name, when he was 36, well past his best and who had never beaten a top level fighter, had been dropped numerous times even at his best and was a light middle by nature.:roll:

And quoting Pierre as a name...:-( Yes he had a good KO ratio against no marks with losing records, he had also lost his previous fight by KO to the great Willie Gibbs and been starched in one round by the vastly overrated Duddy.

The best you can come up with for Zertuche is that he is gutsy...yeah and he also had not fought anyone of any merit and got stopped in his fight after Pavlik as well...because, well...he is not really very good.

Pavlik is willing to fight anyone and deserves FULL respect and credit for what he did to Miranda and what he did against Taylor both times. He is entitled to an easy defence now (against domestic level Lockett) and then I am sure we will see him fight and beat Abraham.

But he is overhyped by people like you, Jetski and Realizm who say he would destroy Calzaghe, destroy Kessler etc and yet his resume is in the main padded and how any boxing fan can deny the glaring holes in his defence, and how wide his attacks are etc, is beyond me.

 

You patently don't know boxing. Kessler would beat the living **** out of Taylor. Kessler has as fast hands as Taylor only his jab is harder, his right hand is much harder, he throws the uppercut far better and he is more accurate.

In addition his timing is better, and he has a better chin.

Explain how Taylor would possibly beat Kessler.

 

Reread your own post and see if you really think you were specific in what the poll would be on. Then go **** off with your self rightousness.:-(