The Gods of War

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stonehands89, Dec 16, 2009.


  1. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    My pick for #1 is still Greb. Think about it, you could argue perfect scores for him in every one of Stoney's criteria. The lowest total I could see him achieving would be about 95 or so, whereas I'd have Robinson at about a 93 or 94.
     
  2. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Based on Stoney's criteria.

    Harry Greb


    Experience: 25/25 (can this really be questioned?)
    Ring Generalship: 15/15 (unless you take away from him on the basis that he wasn't your typical boxer-puncher, which I certainly don't, considering his style was proven against pretty much every manner of opponent imaginable)
    Dominance: 15/15 (Can't really be questioned, IMO)
    Longevity: If Armstrong gets a 13, Greb has to have at least a 14.
    Durability: 10/10 (unquestionable)
    P/LO: I'd have to give him a 10, absolutely no lower than a 9.
    Intangibles: If there's a fighter who deserves a 10 here, it's gotta be Greb. Fighting consistently larger opponents, fighting half blind for the majority of his latter career, immeasurable success inside the ring despite undisciplined work ethic, etc. No lower than a 9

    At the least, that's a 96 or 97 out of 100 possible points. I don't see how Robinson gets the edge based on this.
     
  3. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,499
    Jan 22, 2009
    Thanks a million,Stonehands.Sublime stuff yet again.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007
    Stonehands, do you alter your style so your lilnes fit more succinctly with who you are writing about?
     
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Greb has to be no1, especially considering Stoneys criteria.
     
  6. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Agreed.

    I remember him asking for a McLarnin pic at one point....was it going to encompass more fighters before or did the placings change?
     
  7. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    It's hard to explain. Before actually writing, I immersed myself into the context of time and place as well as into the fighter's personna. Then I tried to capture the essence of the man, the accomplishments, and tried to find the spirit inside it all.

    Each essay presents the context of the era and reflects what I saw as the aura of the man. Burley's is rooted in quiet pride. Pep's reflects his humor and how it was the other side of the almost other-worldly talent that was his, Leonard's in Judaism and intellect. Walker's is injected with comedy. Moore's reflects his charisma and depth. Duran's rage. Ezzard's calls to mind the burgeoning greatness of a teenager and his noble spirit, and so on....
     
  8. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    The placings did change.
     
  9. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    It would be really great if you would make a Top20 out of that ^^
     
  10. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Very interesting concepts on how you construct your stories. You do in fact capture the 'essense' of each of the greats, and it is facinating reading. (I'm a big fan of this series.) It's also interesting that you brought up the subject of rage (with Duran) I think the subjects of your next two pieces fought with a rage as well...An old story I remember from an autobiography of Ronnie Lott the hard nosed all -pro free safety who once had a finger amputated after it was broken in a previous playoff game, so he could play the following week, always stated he played with a consuming rage. That in itself isn't surprising...but he commented that his teamate on those great 49 squads, the cool, unflappable, quarterback Joe Montana also played with a great rage equal to his own...but he displayed it in a much different manner...Cool and detached, but equally intense.

    Rage is a funny thing...I have a feeling these next two gods of boxing had plenty...I've always felt they were desperate men from where they came from and from the times, in which they lived... and desperate men are dangerous men. (if I'm thinking correctly on their identities that is.)
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007


    From a technical perspective, then, I would say your best effort is Armstrong. I got a very strong feeling for your subtle shifts in style re-reading them from start to finish.

    I'm going to stop fawning all over you whenever you put an article up, it's getting pretty embarrassing for me and for you too i'm sure, but once and for all, I think you're an astonishing writer and I also happen to think you've perfected your style, or as near as. It's a privilege to read you stuff. Armstrong and Burley were as good as anything i've ever read in the genre, and I don't just mean on the internet. Word up, Stonie.
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Agree with this 100%.

    It's hard to keep lavishing these articles with praise without sounding like an arse kisser, but seriously, these articles so far have been nothing short of mind blowing.
     
  13. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    It is always good to be recognized for one's work. It isn't untoward in any way, in fact it's encouraging. I'm more self-conscious about it than probably you and fleaman together because I put the freakin thread up... but the purpose of the thread is to get people to see and appreciate not the articles so much as the men. Boxing deserves to be bigger than it is and one of our purposes as fans and analysts, historians, writers, etc is to lend a hand to that goal. Whether it's writing, reading, or what have you.
     
  14. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Agreed.
     
  15. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,499
    Jan 22, 2009
    I'm a Stonehands ass-kisser.I freely admit it.