The great arguments in recent boxing history

how could it be 10-9 diaz? he didn't get penalized for getting knocked down?

 

Not a great argument if one side has hardly any support. You and a handful of others would believe this.

 

Yeah, I've never ever heard of that happening before.

 

I hate all the damned lies about Vitali and Vladimir Klitschko. Vlad is a ring artist and should be watched, he is so very excellent and Vitali is a true warrior who will knock McCline out, then knock out the winner of Maskaev/Peter fight.

 

Johnny Bredahl was knocked down in his fight agaist Paulie Ayala, but the round was scored 10-10 because Bredahl was totally dominating in that round.

 

???

 

1. Never seen the fight
2. **** No
3. I'd pick Lennox Lewis
4. Will see it later :think

 

Right, but that's still not 10-9 in favor of the guy knocked down.

 

but it also must be taken into consideration that a round with a kd should be 10-8, so, give it 10-8 to em and give diaz an extra point for winning the round so 10-9 for em. but 10-9 fo diaz? you'd have to look away from the kd to score that a 10-9 round for diaz noob.

 

exactly!!! what was the dude thinking? his arguement was not even remotley relevant to what we were discussing:yep

 

no one has said the lennox lewis vitali klitchsko...that fued has been going on for ages pictures replays everything to prove a point

which both side say there man won or was winning....till a mischifis dreadlock snapped into vitali eye cutting him in 2 sepratre places....****ing ddreads can they have peace and ****ing brotherly love with eyes...


anyways i feel THIS is biggest arguement of all time

 

1. Leonard.
2. Probably not.
3. Lewis.
4. 10-9. (Morales)

 

You have to deduct a point for the KD, regardless of everything else. I don't see how you could give the round to Diaz.