The greatest lightweight of all time - ROBERTO DURAN

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by dannylatics, Feb 14, 2010.


  1. SnakeFist7

    SnakeFist7 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,977
    0
    Jun 7, 2008
    Stop hatin. Duran deserves all the accolades
     
  2. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    And what did they ever do with that body double that lost to DeJesus?
     
  3. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Marciano has 0 losses and more fights.
    So he is nowhere near as good as marciano.
     
  4. RickyRicardo

    RickyRicardo Member Full Member

    328
    0
    Feb 11, 2010
    Money has fought the best in multiple divisions dude!!!!! Castillo and Corrales alone smoke anyone Marciano fought!!!!!
     
  5. SnakeFist7

    SnakeFist7 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,977
    0
    Jun 7, 2008
    He got owned that night.
     
  6. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    he lost to castillo and shut out a weight drained corrales.
    Woop dee doo.
     
  7. SnakeFist7

    SnakeFist7 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,977
    0
    Jun 7, 2008
    You are obviously a troll. Mayweather is my favorite active fighter, but this **** is just plain old ******ed.
     
  8. RickyRicardo

    RickyRicardo Member Full Member

    328
    0
    Feb 11, 2010
    accolades for losing and Money Mayweather wins and doesnt need excuses like duran
     
  9. RickyRicardo

    RickyRicardo Member Full Member

    328
    0
    Feb 11, 2010
    so your jealous of money mayweather well join the club and still undefeated Money Mayweather!!!!!!!
     
  10. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl Undefeated, sure buddy. He got my respect for taking it to Castillo and beating him in the rematch, but Castillo beat him the first time no doubt about it. Like it or not, he is not undefeated. If you have seen that fight, you know damn well he lost a close, but clear decision to Castillo unless you have serious man crush for Floyd. He is a great fighter, great superfeather, great lightweight, but not a better fighter than Duran. He'd need to beat Mosley, Pac, and then a 160 champ like Pavlik to be in Duran's league. Nothing more, nothing less.
     
  11. SnakeFist7

    SnakeFist7 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,977
    0
    Jun 7, 2008
    He didn't lose. It was a close fight, he got the W and didn't do the chicken **** thing and not give Castillo a rematch even though he didn't have too! But he did so BECAUSE of the response to the fight from fans and the commentators. And he beat him decisively.

    Correlas was weight drained, however he had been fighting at that weight before that time and was KOing everyone. He was ranked higher than Mayweather and was even the favorite. Weight drain is not a good excuse, Correlas knew what he was doing before he took the fight. Either way, he would've lose. It was a complete blow out and how more to do with Mayweather's skill and speed. Just too much. I would say Correlas outside life had more of an effect on him than anything else imo. The guy had to be dying to make weight at those lower weights.
     
  12. SnakeFist7

    SnakeFist7 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,977
    0
    Jun 7, 2008
    The greatest all time fighters all have loses. May's 0 will mean more if he goes on to beat Shane, Pac, Williams, and Berto.
     
  13. RickyRicardo

    RickyRicardo Member Full Member

    328
    0
    Feb 11, 2010
    how can you argue with undefeated????????
     
  14. RickyRicardo

    RickyRicardo Member Full Member

    328
    0
    Feb 11, 2010
    Easy to beat those guys and at the end of the day - 0 losses and retire and your hero Duran and Hearns and the rest of the fab four can be the multi loss club while Money Mayweather 0!!!!!!. Mayweather and Marciano. Forget Williams and Berto those bums. Shane and Pac seal the greatness and retirement for Money Mayweather with 0 losses and you say that much for your fab four?
     
  15. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    seriously bro... zero losses means ****-all unless you fought the best competition possible, which PBF, as of yet, has not. You know this yourself, so why are you trolling the same stupid point over and over? ****... Acelino Freitas was something like 34-0-0 with 34 KO's at one point