The greatest Measure of Greatness is how much you can dominate without getting hit.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jazzo, Oct 12, 2010.


  1. Critic

    Critic Limited Edition Full Member

    3,612
    3
    Nov 30, 2008
    :lol::lol::lol:
     
  2. bambamz

    bambamz Active Member Full Member

    1,068
    0
    Jun 30, 2010
    uhh no i dont think so
     
  3. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    I addressed that.

    You judge competition by the predications of fans before the fight.
     
  4. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    Also, can you keep it down in here?

    Relax and no need to shout.
     
  5. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    See Roger Mayweather.
     
  6. Flyin Ryan

    Flyin Ryan Active Member Full Member

    1,289
    0
    Apr 17, 2006
    If a person is worried about that to the point they completely change their fighting style, I'd tell that person that being a professional boxer is not for them and they should go do a different career.

    If you're going to argue that a person getting hit in the head should be avoided at all costs and ranked higher than anything else in the measure of greatness due to potential brain trauma down the road, you're essentially arguing the sport of boxing should be banned because avoiding injury became a greater concern than the athletic contest of two men punching one another.

    The Measure of Greatness for me is a fighter that is beaten or is knocked down, and is able to come back later (either within the fight or in a later contest) and win. Any idiot can be a frontrunner. When you know the guy across you has beaten you or is hurting you and winning and you're able to comeback? That's something special.
     
  7. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    No, not quite.

    That would be a separate argument.
     
  8. Flyin Ryan

    Flyin Ryan Active Member Full Member

    1,289
    0
    Apr 17, 2006
    I disagree.

    By your measure though the greatest fighter of all-time would be Oscar de la Hoya. Guy made millions upon millions in his career and he took maybe 10 hard shots throughout all of it.
     
  9. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    It is a matter of fact, Flyin.

    Maybe I would make that argument and it would include this issue but the general forum is hardly the place.
     
  10. Janjhalani

    Janjhalani Boxing Terrorist Full Member

    1,056
    0
    Aug 23, 2010
    It's the urge and balls.
     
  11. war4years

    war4years Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,107
    0
    Aug 21, 2004
    Beating other great fighters earns the most respect.
     
  12. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    The greatest measure of greatness is a boxer's ability to win boxing matches.

    Anything else, including what you said, is just a branch of that.
     
  13. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    Which is often wrong, if you follow me.
     
  14. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    5,899
    0
    Dec 8, 2009
    In terms of skill - yes.

    But skill is only one of the many factors that determine ATG status. Resume is by far the most important one.
     
  15. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    That is also a measure I would accept.