THE Greatest Wins In History???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Sep 16, 2008.


  1. smiffy

    smiffy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,420
    0
    May 14, 2008
    i go on about this fight so much it even bores me but nigel benn v gerald mclellan still stands ouit for me as the most brutal fight i've seen. and benn was a huge underdog.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,876
    52,022
    Mar 21, 2007
    40-1 was available on Benn.
     
  3. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Benn vs G-Man comes to mind.
     
  4. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    6
    Jul 21, 2008
    I am not discrediting the performance, hell it would probably be in my top ten, but duran got into leonard's head - he insulted him and leonard took it personally so he basically went out there and tried to take duran out, which is the wrong tactic (unless your hearns) to do against duran.
     
  5. smiffy

    smiffy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,420
    0
    May 14, 2008

    are you sure about that ? seems very long odds .
     
  6. madmanc3210

    madmanc3210 Guest

    nowhere near 40-1 closer to 4-1 benn has never been 40-1 in his career and with good reason
     
  7. madmanc3210

    madmanc3210 Guest

    douglas against tyson was 40-1 i believe
     
  8. smiffy

    smiffy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,420
    0
    May 14, 2008
    its like the douglas tyson one, the myth that douglas was 60-1 is just bollocks. you don't get 60-1 in a two horse race.
     
  9. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I'm sure men with the boxing brains of Sugar Ray Leonard and Angelo Dundee would have realized after a few rounds of Duran outbrawling Leonard, that "taking him out" was simply not possible. If Leonard could have changed the fight that night, he would have done. But he couldn't. That was because of the performance of Roberto Duran.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,876
    52,022
    Mar 21, 2007
    Not 100%, the source is Dark Trade by Donald McRae. It doesn't specify what the specific bet was - just "it was possible to lay money on Benn at 40-1".
     
  11. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    6
    Jul 21, 2008
    It is highly plausible that they felt leonard could have taken duran out in the later rounds, with duran moving up in weight, they may have felt that leonard had more power and speed combined than anyone duran had faced before.

    Look at margarito vs Cotto - cotto was outboxing margarito but margarito kept with the same gameplan all night (not that he has any other :)) and it eventually paid off.
     
  12. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    6
    Jul 21, 2008
    Maybe it meant you could get benn stopping mcclellan in the later rounds for 40-1?
     
  13. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    It is highly implausible that if victory in that fight was as straightforward as "if Leonard had boxed he would've won" as you suggested, that Leonard would have taken the risk and the punishment of brawling for 10-15 rounds for the mere hopeful chance of a stoppage win.
     
  14. The Thruth!!!!!

    The Thruth!!!!! Active Member Full Member

    1,078
    3
    Jul 1, 2008
    Ali/Foreman & Loius/Schmelling II
     
  15. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    101
    Dec 26, 2007
    You are clearly very inexperienced in regards to knowledge of combat.