there taking into consideration, a well known judge came out and explained that them punches are not worthless
I'm not an expert I like to watch boxing. I train at boxing but, apart from low level fights, I'm not a boxer. All these years I've been doing the wrong thing, trying to punch people in the head and body, all I need to do is give my opponents dead arms. When Mayweather does his Philly roll and he uses his ARMS to protect his body he's actually losing on points when people land on his arms. This is new to me like I say I'm not an expert.
aw here will ya stop with that, if I absolouley lether you and you just throw a pitty pat punch they arnt scored the same, obviulsy hitting shoulders and arms isnt as good as hitting someone clean to the body and head, but a renownded judge came out and said them shots arnt totally worthless. And if someone is using the philly shell and just blocking shots all round they dont win points either
Don't say something ridiculous then if you don't want to be ridiculed. What judge was this... CJ Ross. You then go on to clarify your own statement by saying if someone was in the "philly shell and just blocking shots" are your words not mine. I'm referring to the Mayweather- Canelo fight not a made up scenario. Let me clarify my understanding... I land 2 clean jabs flush... You land 10 shots to the arms. The round ends have you won that round? Don't bother replying this is my last response.
you brought up complete shite about you boxing completely exaggerating what I said, and in canelo mayweather fight as I said earlier floyd may have outlanded canelo by a light jab or something for the first 6 rounds but they were landing a very close number of clean shots, you took the conversation away from that fight, Id have the person who landed the two clean jabs flush, my point is a judge explained that arm shots arnt completely worthless but they wernt that relevant in this fight