The H2H argument of the Jermain Taylor apologist.

Just make sure it's the forum only, as he theoretically is a "writer" for the front page.

 

When did you become a mod?

 

Congrats! Now give me 1000 extra in Vcash.

 

:blabla

 

:twisted:

 

Why are you moving here?

 

I hear Jonestown will be committing mass suicide as well.

 

Yeah, I think i agree with ya. Before Taylor fought Hops in '05 he didnt have big names on his resume, with maybe the exception of Raul Marquez (who was a fringe contender anyway) but he beat Hops (however contraversial), so now we have Pavlik, and people say well Jermain has fought better fighters, yeah well Pavlik has more professional fights is a better fighter technically, and has a reach and power advantage over Taylor. Lastly Taylor has looked horrible, and hes gotten this far on skill but skill can only get you so far, after a while, fighters have to learn to mix it up and show better discipline that what Taylor has shown. I dont think Taylor will win, and his fans should realize that.

 

So what are you suggesting, that Pavlik has a near equal or better experience level than Taylor?

 

Damn, good post Jose:good

 

That's a hell of a bet.

 

Im suggesting that before Taylor fought bhop he had no big name on his resume, just like Pavlik now, and Taylor beat Hops anyway, due to his speed style to was to much for an older Hops, and now Pavlik is kinda like in the same situation and will win not because of the names on his resume but cause hes the better fighter.