The "Hatton will KO Pacquaio Bandwaggon"

I don't know what way you are referring too. Honestly.

Radab, Ricky Hatton has a genuine chance at being the first man to defeat Manny Pacquiao since Erik Morales in 2005. Pacquiao has never had his punch resistance put to the test outside of 130lb, and the man has never ever fought at 140. I think Hatton has the power to hurt him.

 

Jesus H Christ.

This is exactly what I said, and that was the reason this Radab first attacked me on this thread and started calling me names! Check back and see.

Who was "on the ****ing money" after all???

I'm logging out, this is Dumb & Dumber. :nut

 

Well you have to admit it you've been asking for a slaying like this for a long time. Whenever someone disagrees with you, you're consistantly rude and provocative, it's not nice when the shoe's on the other foot is it? Think about how you feel just now, and try to keep that in mind before ripping into someone else. Friends? :good

 

The arguement was and is none of my concern. The points he made about your attitude were correct, and I thought perhaps if you were made aware of this, you could make the first steps to changing your ways. You do not have to agree with what I or anyone else has too say, but there is so much hostility in you when you make your points. It is like something out of a horror movie.

That said, you could simply ignore everything I'm saying.

 

Not nice? I couldn't give a flying ****, I've had a hundred guys like you have a go, doesn't stop me does it? Nah, not friends, I'm not a doormat, you call me names, gave me abuse, therefore I'd prefer to have nothing to do with you, thanks all the same.

 

Lol i completely forgot that was what this thread was about in the first place. Thanks for your polite, well put opinion. I dont think Hatton will get to him often enough to be any threat whatsoever. I really do see this one as a mismatch. Hatton didnt have the power to stop Lazcano who was a lightweight too. Pac by stoppage round six.

 

Yes, I will ignore what you're saying, I am perfectly happy with my attitude as I'm sure you are with yours. My attitude has been good enough for me to wrack up 7000 posts without being banned, and make some right good mates in the process. Not interested in your opinion on my personality, as I'm sure you're not with mine, the difference being I wouldn't try and coach you on yours, a pathetic thing to do.

 

You're clearly not concerned enough to coach me on my attitude, but I would probably prefer you to try and do that rather than verbally destroy me, which you are very good at. I will give you that.

 

I don't want to verbally destroy anyone. I came onto this thread, made a comment about how I think Pac-Hatton is a 50-50 fight but that I don't think Hatton can stop Manny, and this Radab guy replied to that post with an abusive attack from nowhere. Sorry if I didn't roll over and ask to have my belly tickled. You would avoid verbal destructions if you weren't so dismissive of people with different opinions to yours. It is very provocative. Your behaviour on my Pac-JMM I thread was unacceptable. Anyway, I'm logging out this minute, it's late and the boxing chat has deteriorated to nothing on this thread.

 

By the same token, Pacquiao was hurt in both fights against Juan Manuel Marquez, not a revered punching machine by any stretch.

I think Lazcano was more a bad night for Ricky than it was so much a sign of him being on the decline. After his devastating defeat at the hands of Floyd Mayweather Jr, Ricky probably was not in the right frame of mind to be fighting the Lazcano's of the world. He had a point to prove against Paulie, who was undeniably the second best 140lb fighter in the world at the time.

There is little doubt in my mind that Ricky can be hurt by the punching power of Manny, but Pacquiao is not surrounded in an impenetrable bubble. He will get caught at some point or another, and he will feel the power of a fully fledged Light Welterweight with some pop. I think the physically stronger man on the night will win, and that is Ricky Hatton.

 

How on earth you manage to keep friends on here when you talk to them like that i have no idea.

 

I still think Pac takes this in a highly competetive fight but if Hatton proves me wrong then more power to the bandwagon. It wasn't too long ago that Pac and his fans were in Hatton's and his fan's shoes so enjoy the ride if it ever takes off.

 

Don't you worry about my friends on here noob, they're not your concern at all. I could not be less interested in your opinion on me, so it's a waste of typing.

 

In the last two instances, you have me all wrong. I was not being dismissive of anybody who had a varied opinion to my own.

In the first thread I was making the point that it was bull**** for anybody to justify what Steele did because Chavez had enough time left to cause long term damage to Taylor. There was 2 seconds left on the clock - let's be realistic. Now I personally would have wished the fight didn't get stopped, but I never ridiculed anybody for thinking otherwise. I thought you unfairly butchered me in that thread, despite my many attempts at trying to clarify my initial point.

Likewise, the second time came around when I made that point that it would be ignorant to disregard all of the circumstances leading up to Morales/Pacquiao 2. Erik endured two back to back wars with two of the best fighters in the world, and was moving up from Lightweight and dropping back down again, even though it was clear he could no longer make 130. That was all I said. I got crucified, once again.

 

Mohak does not understand why this thread even exists. Pac will eat up Hatton.