The "Hatton will KO Pacquaio Bandwaggon"

Yes but it was all spiced with little comments about people being full of **** and others being fairly ignorant. You know that. And on the Pac-JMM thread you were ridiculous.

 

Well.... Marquez has pretty good power and great accuracy, i'm not surprised he hurt Manny. As of late he hurts anyone he steps in with.
And i wouldnt say Paullie was the second best LW at the time. He lost to N'dou in my eyes, and N'dou is nothing special. Bradley would beat him of that i'm sure. Witter as well.

I admire your confidence in the Hitman though, and nothing would make me happier than to be proved wrong come fight night.

 

3 hours of replies suggests otherwise....

 

Agreed. I was ridiculous on the Pac-Jmm thread. After the 2nd fight, I was really emotional because I really believed Juan had won the fight. I make no bones about my behavior at that time.

I said it was "bull****" when one poster made the point that Chavez could have caused long term injury on Taylor if Steele did not finish it. It is not the politically correct way of dealing with discussion, but he never seemed to be offended by it. Sometimes that is the way we handle ourselves on ESB, but I never made a personal attack at the poster in question.

Likewise, I said it would be ignorant of anybody to disregard the circumstances leading up to the Pacquiao/Morales II fight. My vocabulary is not quite of a 5 star standard so it can often get lost in translation, but after I tried to clarify what I meant, you still didn't give me air to breathe.

 

I think Paulie M was more live than either David Diaz or Oscar De La Hoya were. This is not a slight on Manny Pacquiao, sometimes you get dealt with hands you have too deal with. Diaz was never more than a poor belt holder, and Oscar didn't perform at all.

 

Absolutely. And as far as your comment on JMM Pac 2, of course JMM won the fight. It was a dreadful decision. Only the blindest of nut huggers would argue otherwise....

 

Dinamita is going to have something to say about that. :yep

 

Will be an interesting fight, hope it's not PPV.

 

You wish.

Dream on dude...

 

Pac KO!!!!

 

More schoolboy errors and prejudices. Please do not characterize me as a fanboy, as the evidence proves otherwise. If you care to search my posting history for any comments on the second Pac v Marquez fight, you will find that I scored the fight to Marquez by a point and believe the decision was wrong.

However, Radab further erodes any credibility he may have had with utterly ridiculous comments like "a dreadful decision" or "the blindest of nuthuggers". Statements such as these only serve to confirm that he is either an imbecile or blinded by hate. Pac-JMM II was a very very close fight, even Juan Manuel's mother would agree with that. There was one point in it, it was a razor-thin margin of victory IMO. The guy is a clown.

 

^^^the first round is the key round in the pac-jmm 2...i bet you scored it to jmm...i scored it for pac, so i had him winning by 1 point...

 

So the pompous one has returned. My my "Dinamita" after the whipping you took last night i'm surprised you have the audacity to even show face.

As for Pacquiao JMM2.... Close fight? Yes. Clear winner? Absolutely.
I'm sure Marquez' mother would indeed agree that it was a close fight, just as all but the blindest of nuthuggers would try to argue a case that Pacquiao won.

And that Mr Pompouso is Exactly what you are. :hi:

 

I scored it for Marquez because he landed the only shot that got a reaction. I didn't actually see anything land in real time for Pacquiao.

 

The whipping?! Oh you silly baby noobs. Because I refrained from calling you names when you were calling me them, I took a whipping??! I've never took a whipping and I never will, because I choose when to retaliate and when to take the high road. I chose the latter last night and I won, hence why another poster had to tell you to calm down and why you asked me to be your friend - because you were embarrassed at your behaviour. You really are dire. :hi: